Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22147264›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2012

Advances in the laboratory evaluation of peripheral neuropathies.

Mengjing Chloe Huan, Mark Bromberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mengjing Chloe HuanIntermountain Health Care Neurosciences Center, 5171 South Cottonwood Street, #810, Murray, UT 84107, USA. chloe.huan@imail.org
Mark Bromberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral neuropathy is a common clinical problem in neurology and laboratory testing is an integral part of diagnosis. In the past few years, practice parameters have been published to establish an evidence-based guide to neuropathy testing. There are many tests that are common and accepted in practice, but there is no clear mandate on which tests are necessary. This article reviews recent practice parameter publications as well as other updates in laboratory testing for peripheral neuropathy, including the roles of lipid profile, genetic testing, antibody titers, and B(12) testing in a specific dopamine-treated Parkinson's patients. These can serve as recommendations to help guide laboratory testing.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesClinical Laboratory TechniquesGenetic TestingGuidelines as TopicHumansLipidsNeurologyParkinson DiseasePeripheral Nervous System DiseasesAutoantibodiesLipids

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.