SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2012
Updated report on comparative effectiveness of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors for patients with essential hypertension: much more data, little new information.
Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension.Journal of human hypertension · 2019Pooled it
- Differential Sex-Specific Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Therapy on Arterial Function in Hypertension: CALIBREX Trial.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2022Trial
- Olmesartan vs ramipril in the treatment of hypertension and associated clinical conditions in the elderly: a reanalysis of two large double-blind, randomized studies at the light of the most recent blood pressure targets recommended by guidelines.Clinical interventions in aging · 2015Trial
- All in on ARBs: Is it time to fold the ACEIs?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026Review
- Case Report: A reversible autonomic-endothelial migraine pattern: a conceptual perspective illustrated by a clinical case.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Adherence to cardiovascular medication: a review of systematic reviews.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2019Review
- Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Versus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension and the Role of Olmesartan.Advances in therapy · 2019Review
- Patterns and predictors of physician adoption of new cardiovascular drugs.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Renin-Angiotensin System Antagonists in Maintenance Dialysis Patients.Kidney & blood pressure research · 2016Article
- Tolerability of Antihypertensive Medications in Older Adults.Drugs & aging · 2015Review
- Cathepsin B is a New Drug Target for Traumatic Brain Injury Therapeutics: Evidence for E64d as a Promising Lead Drug Candidate.Frontiers in neurology · 2015Review
- Phenotype standardization of angioedema in the head and neck region caused by agents acting on the angiotensin system.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2014Article
- Optimizing combination therapy in the management of hypertension: the role of the aliskiren, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide fixed combination.Integrated blood pressure control · 2013Article
- ACE inhibitors versus ARBs versus DRIs: a systematic update.Journal of general internal medicine · 2012Article
- RAS-Mediated Adaptive Mechanisms in Cardiovascular Tissues: Confounding Factors of RAS Blockade Therapy and Alternative Approaches.Cardiorenal medicine · 2012Article
- Newer is not always better: all antihypertensive medications do not equally reduce cardiovascular risk.Journal of general internal medicine · 2012Article
- The Influence of ACE Inhibition on C1-Inhibitor: A Biomarker for ACE Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema?Biomedicine hubArticle
- Phase 4 Studies in Heart Failure - What is Done and What is Needed?Current cardiology reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesA 2007 systematic review compared angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with hypertension. Direct renin inhibitors (DRIs) have since been introduced, and significant new research has been published. We sought to update and expand the 2007 review. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (through December 2010) and selected other sources for relevant English-language trials. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND
interventionsWe included studies that directly compared ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and/or DRIs in at least 20 total adults with essential hypertension; had at least 12 weeks of follow-up; and reported at least one outcome of interest. Ninety-seven (97) studies (36 new since 2007) directly comparing ACE inhibitors versus ARBs and three studies directly comparing DRIs to ACE inhibitor inhibitors or ARBs were included. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS
methodsA standard protocol was used to extract data on study design, interventions, population characteristics, and outcomes; evaluate study quality; and summarize the evidence.
resultsIn spite of substantial new evidence, none of the conclusions from the 2007 review changed. The level of evidence remains high for equivalence between ACE inhibitors and ARBs for blood pressure lowering and use as single antihypertensive agents, as well as for superiority of ARBs for short-term adverse events (primarily cough). However, the new evidence was insufficient on long-term cardiovascular outcomes, quality of life, progression of renal disease, medication adherence or persistence, rates of angioedema, and differences in key patient subgroups. LIMITATIONS: Included studies were limited by follow-up duration, protocol heterogeneity, and infrequent reporting on patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY
findingsEvidence does not support a meaningful difference between ACE inhibitors and ARBs for any outcome except medication side effects. Few, if any, of the questions that were not answered in the 2007 report have been addressed by the 36 new studies. Future research in this area should consider areas of uncertainty and be prioritized accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.