Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22146919›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2012

Plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: a systematic review.

R Marijn Houwert, Frans-Jasper Wijdicks, Charlotte Steins Bisschop, Egbert-Jan Verleisdonk, Moyo Kruyt

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Meta-analysis of plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation for the treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Should displaced midshaft clavicular fractures be treated surgically? A meta-analysis based on current evidence.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2013
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Is there a difference in plate positioning for clavicle shaft fractures? A retrospective cohort study of 355 cases.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Primary stability of nailing versus low-profile dual plating of mid-clavicular fractures- a biomechanical cadaveric study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R Marijn HouwertDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frans-Jasper Wijdicks
Charlotte Steins Bisschop
Egbert-Jan Verleisdonk
Moyo Kruyt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal surgical approach for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture remains controversial. The objective of this systematic review is to compare functional outcome and complications after plate fixation and intramedullary fixation for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

methodsA computer aided search of PUBMED and Embase was carried out on January 11th 2011. Every study that was published in the English, German, French or Dutch language was considered for inclusion. A total of four studies could be included of which two compared intramedullary fixation versus plate fixation, and two compared intramedullary fixation and plate fixation versus conservative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Studies that compared plate fixation with intramedullary fixation in patients with fresh unilateral displaced midshaft clavicle fractures were included. Dislocation or displacement had to be mentioned in the inclusion criteria of the study for inclusion in this review. The modified version of the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group's former quality assessment tool was used. Furthermore, the studies included were scored according to the GRADE approach to assess the quality. The chosen studies were summarised in a data-extraction form. Because of the different study designs and characteristics data were summarised separately for each study.

conclusionsHigh quality evidence from one study and low quality evidence from three studies showed no difference in functional outcome or complications after plate fixation or intramedullary fixation for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesBone MalalignmentClavicleDatabases, BibliographicFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFractures, BoneHumansJoint DislocationsPostoperative ComplicationsRecovery of FunctionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22146919
PMCPMC3291769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.