Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22146893›Full record

Trial reportCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2012

An immune-active tumor microenvironment favors clinical response to ipilimumab.

Rui-Ru Ji, Scott D Chasalow, Lisu Wang, Omid Hamid, Henrik Schmidt, John Cogswell, Suresh Alaparthy, David Berman, Maria Jure-Kunkel, Nathan O Siemers and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 462 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
462citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

462 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 775 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Preclinical Characterization of CLSP-1025, a First-in-Class, Mutation-Specific T-Cell Engager Targeting a Neoantigen Derived from a Common p53 Mutation.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Functionally heterogeneous intratumoral CD4Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

402 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rui-Ru JiBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ 08543-4000, USA.
Scott D Chasalow
Lisu Wang
Omid Hamid
Henrik Schmidt
John Cogswell
Suresh Alaparthy
David Berman
Maria Jure-Kunkel
Nathan O Siemers
Jeffrey R Jackson
Vafa Shahabi
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USAarhus University Hospital · DKAngeles Clinic and Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIpilimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody specific to CTLA-4, has been shown to improve overall survival in metastatic melanoma patients. As a consequence of CTLA-4 blockade, ipilimumab treatment is associated with proliferation and activation of peripheral T cells. To better understand various tumor-associated components that may influence the clinical outcome of ipilimumab treatment, gene expression profiles of tumors from patients treated with ipilimumab were characterized. EXPERIMENTAL

designGene expression profiling was performed on tumor biopsies collected from 45 melanoma patients before and 3 weeks after the start of treatment in a phase II clinical trial.

resultsAnalysis of pre-treatment tumors indicated that patients with high baseline expression levels of immune-related genes were more likely to respond favorably to ipilimumab. Furthermore, ipilimumab appeared to induce two major changes in tumors from patients who exhibited clinical activity: genes involved in immune response showed increased expression, whereas expression of genes for melanoma-specific antigens and genes involved in cell proliferation decreased. These changes were associated with the total lymphocyte infiltrate in tumors, and there was a suggestion of association with prolonged overall survival in these patients. Many IFN-γ-inducible genes and Th1-associated markers showed increased expression after ipilimumab treatment, suggesting an accumulation of this particular type of T cell at the tumor sites, which might play an important role in mediating the antitumor activity of ipilimumab.

conclusionsThese results support the proposed mechanism of action of ipilimumab, suggesting that cell-mediated immune responses play an important role in the antitumor activity of ipilimumab.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsBiopsyGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingHumansIpilimumabLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMelanomaNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingSkin NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTumor MicroenvironmentAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsIpilimumab

Identifiers

PMID22146893
PMCPMC11028506
OpenAlexW2038914273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.