Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22146565›Full record

ArticleAntiviral research2012

Evaluation of inhaled cidofovir as postexposure prophylactic in an aerosol rabbitpox model.

Daniel Verreault, Satheesh K Sivasubramani, James D Talton, Lara A Doyle, Joseph D Reddy, Stephanie Z Killeen, Peter J Didier, Preston A Marx, Chad J Roy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antiviral research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Drug Development against Smallpox: Present and Future.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel VerreaultDivision of Microbiology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, LA, USA.
Satheesh K Sivasubramani
James D Talton
Lara A Doyle
Joseph D Reddy
Stephanie Z Killeen
Peter J Didier
Preston A Marx
Chad J Roy
Tulane University · USNanotherapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

Tulane NPRC SPF Sheltered Outdoor Enclosure ExpansionP51OD011104 · OD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI L Lee HAMM · 2012 to 2026
$142.4M
ZCM:A NOVEL BROAD-SPECTRUM MICROBICIDE FOR SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONSP51RR000164 · NCRR · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI VEAZEY, RONALD S. · 1985 to 2011
$100.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000164NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200900015CNIH HHS P51 OD011104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smallpox is considered a biological threat based upon the possibility of deliberate reintroduction into the population, creating an urgent need for effective antivirals. The antiviral drug cidofovir (Cr) has shown to be effective against poxviruses, although route-specific nephrotoxicity has hampered its development for emergency post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). In this study, we use a micronized dry powder formulation of pharmaceutical-grade Cr (NanoFOVIRTM; Nf) to treat rabbits exposed to aerosolized rabbitpox virus (RPXV) to further evaluate the effectiveness of direct drug delivery to the lung. Naïve rabbits were infected with RPXV by aerosol; three subsets received aerosolized Nf at 0.5, 1.0 or 1.75mg/kg daily for 3days post-exposure, positive and negative control groups received intravenous (IV) Cr treatments and no treatment, respectively. Nf groups showed an antiviral-dose associated survival of 50% (0.5mg/kg), 80% (1.0mg/kg) and 100% (1.75mg/kg). All animals (100%) from the IV-Cr treatment group and none (0%) from the untreated controls survived. Nf (1.75) protected rabbits from RPX at approximately 10% of the equivalent IV-Cr dose. A dose-related effect was observed in clinical development of RPX disease in Nf groups. Significant reduction of RPX-induced pathological changes was observed in Nf (1.75) and IV-Cr groups. Results suggest that Nf may be a viable antiviral for emergency post-exposure prophylaxis and should be evaluated in other models of poxviral disease.

Indexed as

Post-Exposure ProphylaxisVaccinia virusAdministration, InhalationAnimalsAntiviral AgentsCell LineCidofovirCytosineDisease Models, AnimalFemaleLungMaleOrganophosphonatesRabbitsVacciniaAntiviral AgentsCidofovirCytosineOrganophosphonates

Identifiers

PMID22146565
PMCPMC3505885
OpenAlexW1986592228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.