Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22144917›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2011

The major roles of DNA polymerases epsilon and delta at the eukaryotic replication fork are evolutionarily conserved.

Izumi Miyabe, Thomas A Kunkel, Antony M Carr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic predisposition to polyposis syndromes.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Replication of [AT/TA]Biochemistry · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Replication of [AT/TA]bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. How asymmetric DNA replication achieves symmetrical fidelity.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA during DNA replication and its consequences.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Cancers from NovelCancer research · 2020
    Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Izumi MiyabeGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Thomas A Kunkel
Antony M Carr
University of Sussex · GBNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Structure-Function Studies Of DNA Replication FidelityZIAES065070 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KUNKEL, THOMAS A · 2009 to 2025
$30.6M
Structure-Function Studies Of DNA Replication FidelityZ01ES065070 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KUNKEL, THOMAS A · 1991 to 2008
$4.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES065070Medical Research Council G0801078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordinated replication of eukaryotic genomes is intrinsically asymmetric, with continuous leading strand synthesis preceding discontinuous lagging strand synthesis. Here we provide two types of evidence indicating that, in fission yeast, these two biosynthetic tasks are performed by two different replicases. First, in Schizosaccharomyces pombe strains encoding a polδ-L591M mutator allele, base substitutions in reporter genes placed in opposite orientations relative to a well-characterized replication origin are strand-specific and distributed in patterns implying that Polδ is primarily involved in lagging strand replication. Second, in strains encoding a polε-M630F allele and lacking the ability to repair rNMPs in DNA due to a defect in RNase H2, rNMPs are selectively observed in nascent leading strand DNA. The latter observation demonstrates that abundant rNMP incorporation during replication can be tolerated and that they are normally removed in an RNase H2-dependent manner. This provides strong physical evidence that Polε is the primary leading strand replicase. Collectively, these data and earlier results in budding yeast indicate that the major roles of Polδ and Polε at the eukaryotic replication fork are evolutionarily conserved.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularBase SequenceCdc20 ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA ReplicationGenome, FungalMolecular Sequence DataOrotic AcidPoint MutationReplication OriginRibonuclease HSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins5-fluoroorotic acidCdc20 Proteinscdc6 protein, S pombeCell Cycle ProteinsOrotic AcidRibonuclease Hribonuclease HIISchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteinsura4 protein, S pombe

Identifiers

PMID22144917
PMCPMC3228825
OpenAlexW2129849452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.