ReviewPLoS computational biology2011
Genomics and privacy: implications of the new reality of closed data for the field.
Review in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing core outcomes of responsible stewardship for human genomic data in the cloud.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Proxy panels enable privacy-aware outsourcing of genotype imputation.Genome research · 2025Article
- Open access-enabled evaluation of epigenetic age acceleration in colorectal cancer and development of a classifier with diagnostic potential.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- AI applications in functional genomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Article
- Personal Health Information Inference Using Machine Learning on RNA Expression Data from Patients With Cancer: Algorithm Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Ethical Issues in Research and Development of Epigenome-wide Technologies.Epigenetics insights · 2020Article
- Research and therapy with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs): social, legal, and ethical considerations.Stem cell research & therapy · 2019Review
- Data sharing for clinical utility.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2019Article
- Re-identifiability of genomic data and the GDPR: Assessing the re-identifiability of genomic data in light of the EU General Data Protection Regulation.EMBO reports · 2019Article
- Genomics and data science: an application within an umbrella.Genome biology · 2019Review
- Personal Genome Project UK (PGP-UK): a research and citizen science hybrid project in support of personalized medicine.BMC medical genomics · 2018Article
- Real-time Protection of Genomic Data Sharing in Beacon Services.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2018Article
- Addressing Beacon re-identification attacks: quantification and mitigation of privacy risks.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- An overview of human genetic privacy.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2017Review
- A cloud-based workflow to quantify transcript-expression levels in public cancer compendia.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Novel bioinformatic developments for exome sequencing.Human genetics · 2016Review
- The real cost of sequencing: scaling computation to keep pace with data generation.Genome biology · 2016Article
- Between Openness and Privacy in Genomics.PLoS medicine · 2016Review
- Epigenome data release: a participant-centered approach to privacy protection.Genome biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Open source and open data have been driving forces in bioinformatics in the past. However, privacy concerns may soon change the landscape, limiting future access to important data sets, including personal genomics data. Here we survey this situation in some detail, describing, in particular, how the large scale of the data from personal genomic sequencing makes it especially hard to share data, exacerbating the privacy problem. We also go over various aspects of genomic privacy: first, there is basic identifiability of subjects having their genome sequenced. However, even for individuals who have consented to be identified, there is the prospect of very detailed future characterization of their genotype, which, unanticipated at the time of their consent, may be more personal and invasive than the release of their medical records. We go over various computational strategies for dealing with the issue of genomic privacy. One can "slice" and reformat datasets to allow them to be partially shared while securing the most private variants. This is particularly applicable to functional genomics information, which can be largely processed without variant information. For handling the most private data there are a number of legal and technological approaches-for example, modifying the informed consent procedure to acknowledge that privacy cannot be guaranteed, and/or employing a secure cloud computing environment. Cloud computing in particular may allow access to the data in a more controlled fashion than the current practice of downloading and computing on large datasets. Furthermore, it may be particularly advantageous for small labs, given that the burden of many privacy issues falls disproportionately on them in comparison to large corporations and genome centers. Finally, we discuss how education of future genetics researchers will be important, with curriculums emphasizing privacy and data security. However, teaching personal genomics with identifiable subjects in the university setting will, in turn, create additional privacy issues and social conundrums.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.