Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22143919›Full record

ArticleGenetics2012

Scrambling eggs: meiotic drive and the evolution of female recombination rates.

Yaniv Brandvain, Graham Coop

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A comparative study on recombination activity in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Meiotic Recombination in Teleosts.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Sex differences in crossover interference in house mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A selfish supergene causes meiotic drive through both sexes inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Estimating realized relatedness in free-ranging macaques by inferring identity-by-descent segments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yaniv BrandvainCenter for Population Biology and Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA. ybrandvain@gmail.com
Graham Coop
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theories to explain the prevalence of sex and recombination have long been a central theme of evolutionary biology. Yet despite decades of attention dedicated to the evolution of sex and recombination, the widespread pattern of sex differences in the recombination rate is not well understood and has received relatively little theoretical attention. Here, we argue that female meiotic drivers--alleles that increase in frequency by exploiting the asymmetric cell division of oogenesis--present a potent selective pressure favoring the modification of the female recombination rate. Because recombination plays a central role in shaping patterns of variation within and among dyads, modifiers of the female recombination rate can function as potent suppressors or enhancers of female meiotic drive. We show that when female recombination modifiers are unlinked to female drivers, recombination modifiers that suppress harmful female drive can spread. By contrast, a recombination modifier tightly linked to a driver can increase in frequency by enhancing female drive. Our results predict that rapidly evolving female recombination rates, particularly around centromeres, should be a common outcome of meiotic drive. We discuss how selection to modify the efficacy of meiotic drive may contribute to commonly observed patterns of sex differences in recombination.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionMeiosisRecombination, GeneticAlgorithmsAllelesAnimalsFemaleGenetic LociHumansMaleModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID22143919
PMCPMC3276612
OpenAlexW2000974402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.