Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22143704›Full record

SynthesisMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2012

Immediate implants following tooth extraction. A systematic review.

J Ortega-Martínez, T Pérez-Pascual, S Mareque-Bueno, F Hernández-Alfaro, E Ferrés-Padró

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07774052 (Computer Guided Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molars Using Patient Specific 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Graft Versus Conventional Immediate Implant Placement With Xenograft), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07774052 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Computer Guided Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molars Using Patient Specific 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Graft Versus Conventional Immediate Implant Placement With Xenograft

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahmoud Fawzy Mahmoud MohamedRan2024 to 2026Enrolled17ConditionsImmediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Extraction SocketsArmsPatient-Specific 3D-Printed PLA Socket Guide and Root-Form Scaffold, Conventional Immediate Implant Placement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J Ortega-MartínezFaculty of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Josep Trueta s/n, 08195 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain. jordi.om@hotmail.com
T Pérez-Pascual
S Mareque-Bueno
F Hernández-Alfaro
E Ferrés-Padró

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this article is to review the current state of immediate implants, with their pros and contras, and the clinical indications and contraindications. MATERIAL AND

methodsAn exhaustive literature search has been carried out in the COCHRANE library and MEDLINE electronic databases from 2004 to November 2009. Randomized clinical trials and clinical trials focused on single implants placed in fresh extraction sockets were included and compared. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to heterogeneity of the data.

resultsTwenty studies out of 135 articles from the initial search were finally included, which summed up a total of 1139 immediate implants with at least a 12-month follow-up. Our results have been compared with other current available papers in the literature reviewed that obtained similar outcomes. DISCUSSION: Immediate implants have predictable results with several advantages over delayed implant placement. However, technical complications have been described regarding this technique. Also, biomaterials may be needed when the jumping distance is greater than 1mm or any bone defect is present.

conclusionsFew studies report on success rates rather than survival rates in the literature reviewed. Short-term clinical results were described and results were comparable to those obtained with delayed implant placement. Further long-term, randomized clinical trials are needed to give scientific evidence on the benefits of immediate implants over delayed implant placement.

Indexed as

Tooth ExtractionDental ImplantationHumansTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22143704
PMCPMC3448306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.