Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22143329›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2011

Genome-wide association studies of chronic kidney disease: what have we learned?

Conall M O'Seaghdha, Caroline S Fox

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Frequency of adding salt is a stronger predictor of chronic kidney disease in individuals with genetic risk.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Galectin 3 (Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Conall M O'SeaghdhaNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study and the Center for Population Studies, 73 Mount Wayte Avenue, Suite 2, Framingham, MA 01702, USA.
Caroline S Fox

Funding

Framingham Heart Study/FoxZIAHL006094 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI FOX, CAROLINE · 2010 to 2015
$6.9M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past 3 years have witnessed a dramatic expansion in our knowledge of the genetic determinants of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, heritability estimates of eGFR indicate that we have only identified a small proportion of the total heritable contribution to the phenotypic variation. The majority of associations reported from genome-wide association studies identify genomic regions of interest and further work will be required to identify the causal variants responsible for a specific phenotype. Progress in this area is likely to stem from the identification of novel risk genotypes, which will offer insight into the pathogenesis of disease and potential novel therapeutic targets. Follow-up studies stimulated by findings from genome-wide association studies of kidney disease are already yielding promising results, such as the identification of an association between urinary uromodulin levels and incident CKD. Although this work is at an early stage, prospects for progress in our understanding of CKD and its treatment look more promising now than at any point in the past.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, GeneticGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansKidney Failure, Chronic

Identifiers

PMID22143329
PMCPMC4769862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.