Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22142207›Full record

ArticleEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2011

Differential interference effects of negative emotional states on subsequent semantic and perceptual processing.

Michiko Sakaki, Marissa A Gorlick, Mara Mather

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Arousal-Biased Competition in Perception and Memory.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michiko SakakiDavis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. msakaki@usc.edu
Marissa A Gorlick
Mara Mather

Funding

The Impact of Emotional Regulation on Cognition in AgingR01AG025340 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MATHER, MARA · 2004 to 2021
$7.9M
Brain Mechanisms of Emotion-Cognition Interactions in AgingK02AG032309 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MATHER, MARA · 2009 to 2013
$540k
NIA NIH HHS K02 AG032309NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025340NIA NIH HHS R01AG025340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Past studies have revealed that encountering negative events interferes with cognitive processing of subsequent stimuli. The present study investigates whether negative events affect semantic and perceptual processing differently. Presentation of negative pictures produced slower reaction times than neutral or positive pictures in tasks that require semantic processing, such as natural or man-made judgments about drawings of objects, commonness judgments about objects, and categorical judgments about pairs of words. In contrast, negative picture presentation did not slow down judgments in subsequent perceptual processing (e.g., color judgments about words, size judgments about objects). The subjective arousal level of negative pictures did not modulate the interference effects on semantic or perceptual processing. These findings indicate that encountering negative emotional events interferes with semantic processing of subsequent stimuli more strongly than perceptual processing, and that not all types of subsequent cognitive processing are impaired by negative events.

Indexed as

CognitionEmotionsSemanticsArousalFemaleHumansJudgmentMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeRecognition, PsychologyVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22142207
PMCPMC3342928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.