Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22141399›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2011

GAL1-SceI directed site-specific genomic (gsSSG) mutagenesis: a method for precisely targeting point mutations in S. cerevisiae.

Sarah Piccirillo, Hsiao-Lin Wang, Thomas J Fisher, Saul M Honigberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah PiccirilloSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Hsiao-Lin Wang
Thomas J Fisher
Saul M Honigberg

Funding

Mechanisms underlying pattern formation in S. cerevisiae coloniesR15GM094770 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI HONIGBERG, SAUL M · 2010 to 2017
$1.4M
Gene Regulatory Codes and Signal/Regulatory Element Interactions in IME2R15GM080710 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI HONIGBERG, SAUL M · 2007 to 2009
$268k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM94770NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM080710NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM094770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrecise targeted mutations are defined as targeted mutations that do not require the retention of other genetic changes, such as marker genes, near the mutation site. In the yeast, S. cerevisiae, there are several methods for introducing precise targeted mutations, all of which depend on inserting both a counter-selectable marker and DNA bearing the mutation. For example, the marker can first be inserted, and then replaced with either a long oligonucleotide carrying the mutation (delitto perfetto) or a PCR fragment synthesized with one primer containing the mutation (SSG mutagenesis).

resultsA hybrid method for targeting precise mutation into the genomes uses PCR fragments as in SSG mutagenesis together with a CORE cassette devised for delitto perfetto that contains the homing endonuclease SceI. This method, termed gsSSG mutagenesis, is much more efficient than standard SSG mutagenesis, allowing replacements to be identified without extensive screening of isolates. In gsSSG, recombination between the PCR fragment and the genome occurs equally efficiently regardless of the size of the fragment or the distance between the fragment end and the site of marker insertion. In contrast, the efficiency of incorporating targeted mutations by this method increases as the distance between the mutation and the marker insertion site decreases.

conclusiongsSSG is an efficient way of introducing precise mutations into the genome of S. cerevisiae. The frequency of incorporating the targeted mutation remains efficient at least as far as 460 bp from the insertion site meaning that a single insertion can be used to create many different mutants. The overall efficiency of gsSSG can be estimated based on the distance between the mutation and the marker insertion, and this efficiency can be maximized by limiting the number of untargeted mutations. Thus, a single insertion of marker genes plus homing endonuclease cassette can be used to efficiently introduce precise point mutations through a region of > 900 bp.

Indexed as

Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificGalactokinaseGenetic MarkersGenome, FungalMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPoint MutationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificGAL1 protein, S cerevisiaeGalactokinaseGenetic MarkersSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSCEI protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID22141399
PMCPMC3251539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.