Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22141385›Full record

ReviewDrugs2011

Use of herbal medicines and nutritional supplements in ocular disorders: an evidence-based review.

Justin T Wilkinson, Frederick W Fraunfelder

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plant-Based Care and Therapy in Ophthalmology.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Herbal Medicines in Glaucoma Treatment.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antioxidants and diabetic retinopathy.Current diabetes reports · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration Pharmacology.Handbook of experimental pharmacology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justin T WilkinsonCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR 97239-4197, USA.
Frederick W Fraunfelder
National Eye Institute · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to examine the evidence regarding the use of herbal medicines and nutritional supplements in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), cataracts, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma, and to review the ocular adverse effects of herbal and nutritional agents of clinical importance to ophthalmologists. We performed a literature search of Ovid MEDLINE and selected websites including the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the World Health Organization (WHO). There is strong evidence supporting the use of antioxidants and zinc in patients with certain forms of intermediate and advanced AMD. However, there has been growing evidence regarding potential significant adverse effects associated with the AREDS (Age-Related Eye Disease Study) formula vitamins. Current data does not support the use of antioxidants or herbal medications in the prevention or treatment of cataracts, glaucoma or diabetic retinopathy. It is important for providers to be aware of the benefits and the significant potential adverse effects that have been associated with nutritional supplements and herbal medications, and to properly inform their patients when making decisions about supplementation. Further rigorous evaluation of nutritional supplements and herbal medicines in the treatment of eye disease is needed to determine their safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsPhytotherapyEvidence-Based MedicineEye DiseasesHumans

Identifiers

PMID22141385
OpenAlexW141548993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.