Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22140585›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2011

The NIH-NIAID Filariasis Research Reagent Resource Center.

Michelle L Michalski, Kathryn G Griffiths, Steven A Williams, Ray M Kaplan, Andrew R Moorhead

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep phenotypic profiling uncovers cryptic effects of antifilarial drugs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Nematicidal indole oxazoles and chemoattractants from soil bacteria.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Three isoforms ofmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  7. AssessingiScience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Dual RNA-seq in filarial nematodes andFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Procedure for Handling and Storage ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A high-throughput sensory assay for parasitic and free-living nematodes.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Domestic Dog as a Laboratory Host forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle L MichalskiDepartment of Biology and Microbiology, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, Wisconsin, USA. michalsk@uwosh.edu
Kathryn G Griffiths
Steven A Williams
Ray M Kaplan
Andrew R Moorhead
University of Georgia · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Oshkosh · USSmith College · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000030CPHS HHS HHSN272201000030I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Filarial worms cause a variety of tropical diseases in humans; however, they are difficult to study because they have complex life cycles that require arthropod intermediate hosts and mammalian definitive hosts. Research efforts in industrialized countries are further complicated by the fact that some filarial nematodes that cause disease in humans are restricted in host specificity to humans alone. This potentially makes the commitment to research difficult, expensive, and restrictive. Over 40 years ago, the United States National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH-NIAID) established a resource from which investigators could obtain various filarial parasite species and life cycle stages without having to expend the effort and funds necessary to maintain the entire life cycles in their own laboratories. This centralized resource (The Filariasis Research Reagent Resource Center, or FR3) translated into cost savings to both NIH-NIAID and to principal investigators by freeing up personnel costs on grants and allowing investigators to divert more funds to targeted research goals. Many investigators, especially those new to the field of tropical medicine, are unaware of the scope of materials and support provided by the FR3. This review is intended to provide a short history of the contract, brief descriptions of the fiilarial species and molecular resources provided, and an estimate of the impact the resource has had on the research community, and describes some new additions and potential benefits the resource center might have for the ever-changing research interests of investigators.

Indexed as

Indicators and ReagentsNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.)AnimalsBiomedical ResearchFilariasisHealth ResourcesHumansResearch PersonnelUnited StatesIndicators and Reagents

Identifiers

PMID22140585
PMCPMC3226539
OpenAlexW2042256435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.