Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22140543›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Coerced hospital admission and symptom change--a prospective observational multi-centre study.

Thomas W Kallert, Christina Katsakou, Tomasz Adamowski, Algirdas Dembinskas, Andrea Fiorillo, Lars Kjellin, Anastasia Mastrogianni, Pětr Nawka, Georgi Onchev, Jiri Raboch and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of standardized post-coercion review on subjective coercion: Results of a randomized-controlled trial.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Challenges in the End-of-Life Care for Patients With Severe Persistent Mental Illness: A Case Series.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2026
    Article
  4. The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The role ofThe South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Factorial structure of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Thomas W KallertKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Leipzig, Germany.
Christina Katsakou
Tomasz Adamowski
Algirdas Dembinskas
Andrea Fiorillo
Lars Kjellin
Anastasia Mastrogianni
Pětr Nawka
Georgi Onchev
Jiri Raboch
Matthias Schützwohl
Zahava Solomon
Francisco Torres-González
Stephen Bremner
Stefan Priebe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCoerced admission to psychiatric hospitals, defined by legal status or patient's subjective experience, is common. Evidence on clinical outcomes however is limited. This study aimed to assess symptom change over a three month period following coerced admission and identify patient characteristics associated with outcomes.

methodAt study sites in 11 European countries consecutive legally involuntary patients and patients with a legally voluntary admission who however felt coerced, were recruited and assessed by independent researchers within the first week after admission. Symptoms were assessed on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Patients were re-assessed after one and three months.

resultsThe total sample consisted of 2326 legally coerced patients and 764 patients with a legally voluntary admission who felt coerced. Symptom levels significantly improved over time. In a multivariable analysis, higher baseline symptoms, being unemployed, living alone, repeated hospitalisation, being legally a voluntary patient but feeling coerced, and being initially less satisfied with treatment were all associated with less symptom improvement after one month and, other than initial treatment satisfaction, also after three months. The diagnostic group was not linked with outcomes. DISCUSSION: On average patients show significant but limited symptom improvements after coerced hospital admission, possibly reflecting the severity of the underlying illnesses. Social factors, but not the psychiatric diagnosis, appear important predictors of outcomes. Legally voluntary patients who feel coerced may have a poorer prognosis than legally involuntary patients and deserve attention in research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

CoercionAdultBrief Psychiatric Rating ScaleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansLinear ModelsMaleModels, BiologicalMultivariate AnalysisPatient AdmissionPatient SelectionProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID22140543
PMCPMC3227658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.