Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22140105›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2012

ScerTF: a comprehensive database of benchmarked position weight matrices for Saccharomyces species.

Aaron T Spivak, Gary D Stormo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cohesin Facilitates Nucleosome Invasion by Transcription Factors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Origin recognition complex harbors an intrinsic nucleosome remodeling activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. eLife · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Homotypic cooperativity and collective binding are determinants of bHLH specificity and function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Comprehensive, high-resolution binding energy landscapes reveal context dependencies of transcription factor binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron T SpivakDepartment of Genetics, Washington University Medical School, St Louis, MO, USA.
Gary D Stormo
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

DNA PATTERN IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSISR01HG000249 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI STORMO, GARY D · 1990 to 2017
$5.6M
Deciphering the regulatory code of a cellR01GM078222 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI STORMO, GARY D · 2007 to 2010
$1.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG00249NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG000249NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a primary model for studies of transcriptional control, and the specificities of most yeast transcription factors (TFs) have been determined by multiple methods. However, it is unclear which position weight matrices (PWMs) are most useful; for the roughly 200 TFs in yeast, there are over 1200 PWMs in the literature. To address this issue, we created ScerTF, a comprehensive database of 1226 motifs from 11 different sources. We identified a single matrix for each TF that best predicts in vivo data by benchmarking matrices against chromatin immunoprecipitation and TF deletion experiments. We also used in vivo data to optimize thresholds for identifying regulatory sites with each matrix. To correct for biases from different methods, we developed a strategy to combine matrices. These aligned matrices outperform the best available matrix for several TFs. We used the matrices to predict co-occurring regulatory elements in the genome and identified many known TF combinations. In addition, we predict new combinations and provide evidence of combinatorial regulation from gene expression data. The database is available through a web interface at http://ural.wustl.edu/ScerTF. The site allows users to search the database with a regulatory site or matrix to identify the TFs most likely to bind the input sequence.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticBinding SitesInternetPosition-Specific Scoring MatricesPromoter Regions, GeneticSaccharomycesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsUser-Computer InterfaceTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22140105
PMCPMC3245033
OpenAlexW2099922553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.