Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22139591›Full record

Trial reportNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2012

Lamotrigine XR conversion to monotherapy: first study using a historical control group.

Jacqueline A French, Nancy R Temkin, Bassel F Shneker, Anne E Hammer, Paul T Caldwell, John A Messenheimer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialReview
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00355082 (A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Conversion to Monotherapy Comparison of Two Doses of Lamotrigine for the Treatment of Partial Seizures), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00355082 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Conversion to Monotherapy Comparison of Two Doses of Lamotrigine for the Treatment of Partial Seizures

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2006 to 2008Enrolled226ConditionsEpilepsy, PartialArmslamotrigine, 300 mg/day, lamotrigine, 250 mg/day
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Update on once-daily zonisamide monotherapy in partial seizures.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2014
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Creation and implementation of a historical controls database from randomized clinical trials.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Antiepileptic drug selection for partial-onset seizures.Current treatment options in neurology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacqueline A FrenchNYU Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York, NY 10016, USA. Jacqueline.French@nyumc.org
Nancy R Temkin
Bassel F Shneker
Anne E Hammer
Paul T Caldwell
John A Messenheimer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of lamotrigine extended-release tablets (LTG XR) as monotherapy for partial seizures were evaluated using the conversion-to-monotherapy design, and historical data as the control. This methodology was recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, and this study is the first historical control design in epilepsy to complete enrollment. Patients ≥13 years old with uncontrolled partial epilepsy receiving monotherapy with valproate or a noninducing antiepileptic drug were converted to once-daily LTG XR (250 mg or 300 mg) as monotherapy and were followed up for 12 additional weeks. Efficacy was measured by the proportion of patients meeting predefined escape criteria for seizure worsening compared with aggregated pseudoplacebo control data from 8 previously conducted conversion-to-monotherapy trials. Nonoverlap of the 95% confidence limit for LTG XR and the 95% prediction interval of the historical control denotes efficacy. Of 226 randomized patients, 174 (93 in 300 mg/day group and 81 in 250 mg/day group) started withdrawal of the background AED and were evaluated for escape. In the historical control analysis population, the lower 95% prediction interval of the historical control (65.3%) was not overlapped by the upper 95% confidence limit of either LTG XR (300 mg/day; 37.2%) or LTG XR (250 mg/day; 43.4%). Adverse events were reported in 53% and 61% of patients receiving LTG XR (300 mg/day and 250 mg/day, respectively). LTG XR (250 mg or 300 mg once daily) is effective for conversion-to-monotherapy treatment of partial seizures in patients ≥13 years old.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticonvulsantsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Delivery SystemsEpilepsies, PartialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternational CooperationLamotrigineMaleAnticonvulsantsLamotrigineTriazinesValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID22139591
PMCPMC3271149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.