ReviewBone marrow transplantation2012
Is it time to revisit our current hematopoietic progenitor cell quantification methods in the clinic?
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for MicroRNA Transfer into Adult Bone Marrow-derived Hematopoietic Stem Cells to Enable Cell Engineering Combined with Magnetic Targeting.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- Flow Cytometric Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Assay Enables a Fast and Accurate Human Umbilical Cord Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Assessment.Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2017Article
- Development and validation of a rapid, aldehyde dehydrogenase bright-based cord blood potency assay.Blood · 2016Article
- Magnet-Bead Based MicroRNA Delivery System to Modify CD133Stem cells international · 2016Article
- How to Improve Cord Blood Engraftment?Frontiers in medicine · 2016Review
- Differential expression of the transcription factor ARID3a in lupus patient hematopoietic progenitor cells.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2015Article
- To breathe or not to breathe: the haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells dilemma.British journal of pharmacology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the clinical practice of hematopoietic SCT, the minimum numbers of cells required for a successful engraftment are defined on the basis of their CD45 and CD34 expression profiles. However, the quantity of earlier progenitors or CD34-positive cells at different differentiation stages within stem cell grafts is not generally taken into consideration. During the last decade, various teams have quantified the number of cells expressing various combinations of CD34, CD38, CD133, CD90 co-expression and/or aldehyde dehydrogenase functional capacity using flow cytometry. Some of these studies resulted in the greater appreciation that combinations of these Ags were associated with varied myeloid, erythroid and platelet engraftment rates whereas others showed that the relative absence or presence of these markers could define cells responsible for either short- or long-term engraftment. These findings were also extended to differences between progenitor cell populations found within BM vs peripheral or cord-blood grafts. Cells harvested from donors are also generally frozen and stored; thawed cells have variable levels of viability and functional capacity based on the time tested post thaw, which also can be assessed by flow cytometry. Finally, flow cytometry has the potential for analysis of cells carrying a mesenchymal stem cell phenotype, which may be quiescent within some of the stem cell products. This review will address the need for stem cell subpopulation quantification and summarize existing published data to identify some Ags and functional characteristics that can be applicable to daily clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22139068What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.