ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2012
The phenotypic distribution of quantitative traits in a wild mouse F1 population.
Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequence analysis of chromosome 1 revealed different selection patterns between Chinese wild mice and laboratory strains.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human complex diseases such as hypertension, precocious puberty, and diabetes have their own diagnostic thresholds, which are usually estimated from the epidemiological data of nature populations. In the mouse models, numerous phenotypic data of complex traits have been accumulated; however, knowledge of the phenotypic distribution of the natural mouse populations remains quite limited. In order to investigate the distribution of quantitative traits of wild mice, 170 F1 progeny aged 8-10 weeks and derived from wild mice collected from eight spots in the suburbs of Shanghai were tested for their values of anatomic, blood chemical, and blood hematological parameters. All the wild mice breeders were of Mus. m. musculus and Mus. m. castaneus maternal origin according to the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers of the mitochondrial DNA. The results showed that phenotypes in wild mice had a normal distribution with four to six times the standard deviation. For the majority of the traits, the wild outbred mice and laboratory inbred mice have significantly different ranges and mean values, whereas the wild mice did not necessarily show more phenotypic diversity than the inbred ones. Our data also showed that natural populations may have some unique phenotypes related to sugar and protein metabolism, as the mean value of wild mice differ dramatically from the inbred mice in the levels of blood glucose, BUN (blood urea nitrogen), and total blood protein. The epidemiological information of the complex traits in the nature population from our study provided valuable reference for the application of mouse models in those complex disease studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.