Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22138493›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2012

Metals in biology: defining metalloproteomes.

Steven M Yannone, Sophia Hartung, Angeli L Menon, Michael W W Adams, John A Tainer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Forced Biomineralization: A Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven M YannoneLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States. SMYannone@lbl.gov
Sophia Hartung
Angeli L Menon
Michael W W Adams
John A Tainer
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Structure and Assembly of Type IV Pili &Related SystemsR01AI022160 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI TAINER, JOHN A. · 1985 to 2009
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS AI22160NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI022160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vital nature of metal uptake and balance in biology is evident in the highly evolved strategies to facilitate metal homeostasis in all three domains of life. Several decades of study on metals and metalloproteins have revealed numerous essential bio-metal functions. Recent advances in mass spectrometry, X-ray scattering/absorption, and proteomics have exposed a much broader usage of metals in biology than expected. Even elements such as uranium, arsenic, and lead are implicated in biological processes as part of an emerging and expansive view of bio-metals. Here we discuss opportunities and challenges for established and newer approaches to study metalloproteins with a focus on technologies that promise to rapidly expand our knowledge of metalloproteins and metal functions in biology.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaEcosystemHumansMass SpectrometryMetalloproteinsMetalsModels, MolecularProteomeMetalloproteinsMetalsProteome

Identifiers

PMID22138493
PMCPMC3273585
OpenAlexW1964760602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.