Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22138491›Full record

ReviewTrends in molecular medicine2012

CFTR: folding, misfolding and correcting the ΔF508 conformational defect.

Gergely L Lukacs, A S Verkman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in molecular medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 226 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
226citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

226 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. PheWAS analysis on large-scale biobank data with PheTK.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  20. Structural and energetic analysis of stabilizing indel mutations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article

166 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gergely L LukacsDepartment of Physiology and GRASP, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec H3E 1Y6, Canada. gergely.lukacs@mcgill.ca
A S Verkman

Funding

SynthesisP30DK072517 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VERKMAN, ALAN S · 2005 to 2022
$18.1M
Correction of defective functional expression of CFTR in cystic fibrosisR01DK075302 · NIDDK · MCGILL UNIVERSITY · PI LUKACS, GERGELY L. · 2006 to 2020
$3.3M
CIHRNIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072517NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK075302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF), the most common lethal genetic disease in the Caucasian population, is caused by loss-of-function mutations of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), a cyclic AMP-regulated plasma membrane chloride channel. The most common mutation, deletion of phenylalanine 508 (ΔF508), impairs CFTR folding and, consequently, its biosynthetic and endocytic processing as well as chloride channel function. Pharmacological treatments may target the ΔF508 CFTR structural defect directly by binding to the mutant protein and/or indirectly by altering cellular protein homeostasis (proteostasis) to promote ΔF508 CFTR plasma membrane targeting and stability. This review discusses recent basic research aimed at elucidating the structural and trafficking defects of ΔF508 CFTR, a prerequisite for the rational design of CF therapy to correct the loss-of-function phenotype.

Indexed as

MutationProtein FoldingAnimalsCystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorDrug DiscoveryHumansModels, MolecularProtein TransportCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator

Identifiers

PMID22138491
PMCPMC3643519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.