Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22137502›Full record

ReviewBioorganic chemistry2012

Cooperativity in monomeric enzymes with single ligand-binding sites.

Carol M Porter, Brian G Miller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioorganic chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A suicidal and extensively disordered luciferase with a bright luminescence.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Characterization and insight mechanism of an acid-adapted β-Glucosidase fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. European journal of organic chemistry · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Binding of cardiotonic steroids to NaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carol M PorterDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 217 Dittmer Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4390, USA.
Brian G Miller

Funding

Human GlucokinaseR01DK081358 · NIDDK · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, BRIAN GENE · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK081358NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK081358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperativity is widespread in biology. It empowers a variety of regulatory mechanisms and impacts both the kinetic and thermodynamic properties of macromolecular systems. Traditionally, cooperativity is viewed as requiring the participation of multiple, spatially distinct binding sites that communicate via ligand-induced structural rearrangements; however, cooperativity requires neither multiple ligand binding events nor multimeric assemblies. An underappreciated manifestation of cooperativity has been observed in the non-Michaelis-Menten kinetic response of certain monomeric enzymes that possess only a single ligand-binding site. In this review, we present an overview of kinetic cooperativity in monomeric enzymes. We discuss the primary mechanisms postulated to give rise to monomeric cooperativity and highlight modern experimental methods that could offer new insights into the nature of this phenomenon. We conclude with an updated list of single subunit enzymes that are suspected of displaying cooperativity, and a discussion of the biological significance of this unique kinetic response.

Indexed as

LigandsBinding SitesCatalytic DomainEnzymesKineticsProlineThermodynamicsEnzymesLigandsProline

Identifiers

PMID22137502
PMCPMC3307832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.