Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22137415›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2011

Primary care access and its relationship with emergency department utilisation: an observational, cross-sectional, ecological study.

Matthew J Harris, Brijesh Patel, Simon Bowen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Are more GPs associated with a reduction in emergency hospital admissions? A quantitative study on GP referral in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Is the use of emergency departments socially patterned?International journal of public health · 2018
    Observational
  19. Population and patient factors affecting emergency department attendance in London: retrospective cohort analysis of linked primary and secondary care records.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew J HarrisDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London. m.harris@imperial.ac.uk
Brijesh Patel
Simon Bowen
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent health service policies in the UK have focused on improving primary care access in order to reduce the use of costly emergency department services, even though the relationship between the two is based on weak or little evidence. Research is required to establish whether improving primary care access can influence emergency department attendance.

aimTo ascertain whether a relationship exists between the degree of access to GP practices and avoidable emergency department attendances in an inner-London primary care trust (PCT). DESIGN AND

settingObservational, cross-sectional ecological study in 68 general practices in Brent Primary Care Trust, north London, UK.

methodGP practices were used as the unit of analysis and avoidable emergency department attendance as the dependent variable. Routinely collected data from GP practices, Hospital Episode Statistics, and census data for the period covering 2007-2009 were used across three broad domains: GP access characteristics, population characteristics, and health status aggregated to the level of the GP practice. Multiple linear regression was used to ascertain which variables account for the variation in emergency department attendance experienced by patients registered to each GP practice.

resultsNone of the GP access variables accounted for the variation in emergency department attendance. The only variable that explained this variance was the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). For every unit increase in IMD score of the GP practice, there would be an increase of 6.13 (95% CI = 4.56, 7.70) per 1000 patients per year in emergency department attendances. This accounted for 47.9% of the variance in emergency department attendances in Brent.

conclusionAvoidable emergency department attendance appears to be mostly driven by underlying deprivation rather than by the degree of access to primary care.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalGeneral PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLondonPatient Acceptance of Health CareUnnecessary Procedures

Identifiers

PMID22137415
PMCPMC3223776
OpenAlexW2112165286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.