Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22136218›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2011

Comparative analysis of root transcriptome profiles of two pairs of drought-tolerant and susceptible rice near-isogenic lines under different drought stress.

Ali Moumeni, Kouji Satoh, Hiroaki Kondoh, Takayuki Asano, Aeni Hosaka, Ramiah Venuprasad, Rachid Serraj, Arvind Kumar, Hei Leung, Shoshi Kikuchi

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Deciphering drought-response in wheat (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Transcriptome Profiling ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. ThePlant direct · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identification of tomato root growth regulatory genes and transcription factors through comparative transcriptomic profiling of different tissues.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.

Ali MoumeniPlant Genome Research Unit, Agrogenomics Research Center, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Kan'non dai 2-1-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Kouji Satoh
Hiroaki Kondoh
Takayuki Asano
Aeni Hosaka
Ramiah Venuprasad
Rachid Serraj
Arvind Kumar
Hei Leung
Shoshi Kikuchi
Institute of Agrobiological Sciences · JPInternational Rice Research Institute · PHInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas · SYInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlant roots are important organs to uptake soil water and nutrients, perceiving and transducing of soil water deficit signals to shoot. The current knowledge of drought stress transcriptomes in rice are mostly relying on comparative studies of diverse genetic background under drought. A more reliable approach is to use near-isogenic lines (NILs) with a common genetic background but contrasting levels of resistance to drought stress under initial exposure to water deficit. Here, we examined two pairs of NILs in IR64 background with contrasting drought tolerance. We obtained gene expression profile in roots of rice NILs under different levels of drought stress help to identify genes and mechanisms involved in drought stress.

resultsGlobal gene expression analysis showed that about 55% of genes differentially expressed in roots of rice in response to drought stress treatments. The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) increased in NILs as the level of water deficits, increased from mild to severe condition, suggesting that more genes were affected by increasing drought stress. Gene onthology (GO) test and biological pathway analysis indicated that activated genes in the drought tolerant NILs IR77298-14-1-2-B-10 and IR77298-5-6-B-18 were mostly involved in secondary metabolism, amino acid metabolism, response to stimulus, defence response, transcription and signal transduction, and down-regulated genes were involved in photosynthesis and cell wall growth. We also observed gibberellic acid (GA) and auxin crosstalk modulating lateral root formation in the tolerant NILs.

conclusionsTranscriptome analysis on two pairs of NILs with a common genetic background (~97%) showed distinctive differences in gene expression profiles and could be effective to unravel genes involved in drought tolerance. In comparison with the moderately tolerant NIL IR77298-5-6-B-18 and other susceptible NILs, the tolerant NIL IR77298-14-1-2-B-10 showed a greater number of DEGs for cell growth, hormone biosynthesis, cellular transports, amino acid metabolism, signalling, transcription factors and carbohydrate metabolism in response to drought stress treatments. Thus, different mechanisms are achieving tolerance in the two tolerant lines.

Indexed as

DroughtsTranscriptomeGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenotypeMicroarray AnalysisOryzaPlant RootsRNA, PlantStress, PhysiologicalRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID22136218
PMCPMC3268746
OpenAlexW1992272412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.