Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22135405›Full record

ArticleGenome research2011

Genome-wide analysis of retrogene polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster.

Daniel R Schrider, Kristian Stevens, Charis M Cardeño, Charles H Langley, Matthew W Hahn

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The mutational load in natural populations is significantly affected by high primary rates of retroposition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel R SchriderDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA. dschride@indiana.edu
Kristian Stevens
Charis M Cardeño
Charles H Langley
Matthew W Hahn
University of California, Davis · USIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Drosophila Population GenomicsR01HG002942 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LANGLEY, CHARLES HUNT · 2004 to 2011
$8.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG02942NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication via retrotransposition has been shown to be an important mechanism in evolution, affecting gene dosage and allowing for the acquisition of new gene functions. Although fixed retrotransposed genes have been found in a variety of species, very little effort has been made to identify retrogene polymorphisms. Here, we examine 37 Illumina-sequenced North American Drosophila melanogaster inbred lines and present the first ever data set and analysis of polymorphic retrogenes in Drosophila. We show that this type of polymorphism is quite common, with any two gametes in the North American population differing in the presence or absence of six retrogenes, accounting for ~13% of gene copy-number heterozygosity. These retrogenes were identified by a straightforward method that can be applied using any type of DNA sequencing data. We also use a variant of this method to conduct a genome-wide scan for intron presence/absence polymorphisms, and show that any two chromosomes in the population likely differ in the presence of multiple introns. We show that these polymorphisms are all in fact deletions rather than intron gain events present in the reference genome. Finally, by leveraging the known location of the parental genes that give rise to the retrogene polymorphisms, we provide direct evidence that natural selection is responsible for the excess of fixations of retrogenes moving off of the X chromosome in Drosophila. Further efforts to identify retrogene and intron presence/absence polymorphisms will undoubtedly improve our understanding of the evolution of gene copy number and gene structure.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosomes, InsectDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene DosageGenes, InsectGenome-Wide Association StudyIntronsMalePolymorphism, GeneticX Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID22135405
PMCPMC3227099
OpenAlexW2172161352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.