Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22135276›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2012

Comprehensive sequence analysis of nine Usher syndrome genes in the UK National Collaborative Usher Study.

Polona Le Quesne Stabej, Zubin Saihan, Nell Rangesh, Heather B Steele-Stallard, John Ambrose, Alison Coffey, Jenny Emmerson, Elene Haralambous, Yasmin Hughes, Karen P Steel and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A Comparative Evaluation of the Genetic Variant Spectrum in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Successful large gene augmentation of USH2A with non-viral episomal vectors.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Polona Le Quesne StabejClinical and Molecular Genetics, Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.
Zubin Saihan
Nell Rangesh
Heather B Steele-Stallard
John Ambrose
Alison Coffey
Jenny Emmerson
Elene Haralambous
Yasmin Hughes
Karen P Steel
Linda M Luxon
Andrew R Webster
Maria Bitner-Glindzicz
University College London · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0300212Medical Research Council MC_QA137918Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsher syndrome (USH) is an autosomal recessive disorder comprising retinitis pigmentosa, hearing loss and, in some cases, vestibular dysfunction. It is clinically and genetically heterogeneous with three distinctive clinical types (I-III) and nine Usher genes identified. This study is a comprehensive clinical and genetic analysis of 172 Usher patients and evaluates the contribution of digenic inheritance.

methodsThe genes MYO7A, USH1C, CDH23, PCDH15, USH1G, USH2A, GPR98, WHRN, CLRN1 and the candidate gene SLC4A7 were sequenced in 172 UK Usher patients, regardless of clinical type.

resultsNo subject had definite mutations (nonsense, frameshift or consensus splice site mutations) in two different USH genes. Novel missense variants were classified UV1-4 (unclassified variant): UV4 is 'probably pathogenic', based on control frequency <0.23%, identification in trans to a pathogenic/probably pathogenic mutation and segregation with USH in only one family; and UV3 ('likely pathogenic') as above, but no information on phase. Overall 79% of identified pathogenic/UV4/UV3 variants were truncating and 21% were missense changes. MYO7A accounted for 53.2%, and USH1C for 14.9% of USH1 families (USH1C:c.496+1G>A being the most common USH1 mutation in the cohort). USH2A was responsible for 79.3% of USH2 families and GPR98 for only 6.6%. No mutations were found in USH1G, WHRN or SLC4A7.

conclusionsOne or two pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in 86% of cases. No convincing cases of digenic inheritance were found. It is concluded that digenic inheritance does not make a significant contribution to Usher syndrome; the observation of multiple variants in different genes is likely to reflect polymorphic variation, rather than digenic effects.

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisCohort StudiesGenetic Association StudiesGenotypeHumansMultifactorial InheritanceMutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideUnited KingdomUsher Syndromes

Identifiers

PMID22135276
PMCPMC3678402
OpenAlexW2102132383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.