Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22135258›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Evaluation of the VersaTREK system compared to the Bactec MGIT 960 system for first-line drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

M Espasa, M Salvadó, E Vicente, G Tudó, F Alcaide, P Coll, N Martin-Casabona, M Torra, D Fontanals, J González-Martín

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Advances in TB testing.Advances in clinical chemistry · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Tuberculosis in the Elderly.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Characterization ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M EspasaLaboratori de Microbiologia, UDIAT-CD, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Departament de Genètica i Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. mespasa@tauli.cat
M Salvadó
E Vicente
G Tudó
F Alcaide
P Coll
N Martin-Casabona
M Torra
D Fontanals
J González-Martín

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the VersaTREK system for Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing compared with results obtained with the Bactec MGIT 960 system. A total of 67 strains were evaluated. Overall agreement was at 98.5%. Kappa indexes were 1.0 for isoniazid, rifampin, and ethambutol, 0.937 for pyrazinamide, and 0.907 for streptomycin. The VersaTREK system is validated for M. tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID22135258
PMCPMC3264154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.