Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22135185›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2012

Pharmacogenetics in chronic heart failure: new developments and current challenges.

Jasmine A Talameh, David E Lanfear

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Population Pharmacokinetic Studies of Digoxin in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jasmine A TalamehUNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Institute for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
David E Lanfear

Funding

Impact of Race and Genetic Factors on Beta-blocker Effectiveness in Heart FailureR01HL103871 · NHLBI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI LANFEAR, DAVID E · 2011 to 2015
$3.5M
Pharmacogenetics of the B-type Natriuretic Peptide PathwayK23HL085124 · NHLBI · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI LANFEAR, DAVID E · 2008 to 2012
$632k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL085124NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The individual patient responses to chronic heart failure (HF) pharmacotherapies are highly variable. This variability cannot be entirely explained by clinical characteristics, and genetic variation may play a role. Therefore, this review will summarize the background pharmacogenetic literature for major HF pharmacotherapy classes (ie, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, digoxin, and loop diuretics), evaluate recent advances in the HF pharmacogenetic literature in the context of previous findings, and discuss the challenges and conclusions for HF pharmacogenetic data and its clinical application.

Indexed as

PharmacogeneticsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsChronic DiseaseDigoxinHeart FailureHumansPrecision MedicineSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsDigoxinSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22135185
PMCPMC3917307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.