Trial reportMayo Clinic proceedings2011
Population screening for barrett esophagus: a prospective randomized pilot study.
Trial report in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Population Based Screening for Barrett's Esophagus in Olmsted County : A Pilot Study
Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of Capsule Endoscopy With PillCam UGI Capsule Compared to Standard Endoscopy for Screening of Barrett's Esophagus: A Prospective Tandem Study
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Guideline on screening for esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020Guideline
- ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016Guideline
- Cost analysis of office-based transnasal esophagoscopy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019Trial
- A randomized comparative effectiveness trial of novel endoscopic techniques and approaches for Barrett's esophagus screening in the community.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2015Trial
- Comparative acceptability of transnasal esophagoscopy and esophageal capsule esophagoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial in veterans.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2014Trial
- Screening for Barrett's esophagus: results from a population-based survey.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2014Trial
- Design and Evaluation of ScanCap: A Low-Cost, Reusable Tethered Capsule Endoscope with Blue-Green Illumination Imaging for Unsedated Screening and Early Detection of Barrett's Esophagus.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Public Preference Heterogeneity and Predicted Uptake Rate of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening Programs in Rural China: Discrete Choice Experiments and Latent Class Analysis.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Article
- Public acceptance and uptake of oesophageal adenocarcinoma screening strategies: A mixed-methods systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Public Preferences and Predicted Uptake for Esophageal Cancer Screening Strategies: A Labeled Discrete Choice Experiment.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Review
- Recent Advances in Screening for Barrett's Esophagus.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Screening for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: rationale, recent progress, challenges, and future directions.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2015Review
- Video capsule endoscopy: perspectives of a revolutionary technique.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Review
- Management strategies of Barrett's esophagus.World journal of gastroenterology · 2012Review
- Diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the feasibility of unsedated transnasal endoscopy (uTNE) and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) as alternatives to sedated endoscopy (sEGD) as screening tools for Barrett esophagus (BE) and to obtain preliminary estimates of participation rates for sEGD, uTNE, and VCE when used for community BE screening in a population cohort. PATIENTS AND
methodsFrom February 1, 2009, to May 31, 2010, patients from Olmsted County, Minnesota, who were older than 50 years and had no history of known BE were randomized (stratified by age, sex, reflux symptoms noted in a validated questionnaire) into 3 groups for esophageal evaluation with sEGD, uTNE, or VCE. Participation rates and safety profiles were estimated.
resultsWe contacted 127 patients to recruit 20 for each procedure arm (60 total). The probability of participation was 38% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26%-51%) for sEGD, 50% (95% CI, 35%-65%) for uTNE, and 59% (95% CI, 42%-74%) for VCE. Both uTNE and VCE were well tolerated without adverse effects. BE was identified in 3 patients and esophagitis in 8.
conclusionUnsedated techniques may be acceptable, feasible, and safe alternatives to sEGD to screen for BE in the community.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00943280.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.