Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22134580›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2012

Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Bronson D Riley, Julie O Culver, Cécile Skrzynia, Leigha A Senter, June A Peters, Josephine W Costalas, Faith Callif-Daley, Sherry C Grumet, Katherine S Hunt, Rebecca S Nagy and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 157 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 328 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic evidence review and meta-analysis of outcomes associated with cancer genetic counseling.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Disclosure of genetic information to family members: a systematic review of normative documents.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. American Society of Clinical Oncology Expert Statement: collection and use of a cancer family history for oncology providers.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Guideline
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. The Genetic Education for Men (GEM) Trial: Development of Web-Based Education for Untested Men in BRCA1/2-Positive Families.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Use of Family Relationships in Commercial Claims Data to Characterize Clinical Events of Patients withAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Bronson D RileySoutheast Nebraska Cancer Center, Lincoln, NE, USA. bronsonr@leadingcancercare.com
Julie O Culver
Cécile Skrzynia
Leigha A Senter
June A Peters
Josephine W Costalas
Faith Callif-Daley
Sherry C Grumet
Katherine S Hunt
Rebecca S Nagy
Wendy C McKinnon
Nancie M Petrucelli
Robin L Bennett
Angela M Trepanier
Cancer Genetics (United States) · USAllen Hospital · USCity of Hope · USDayton Children's Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMonmouth Medical Center · USSoutheast Nebraska Cancer Center · USSt. Mary Medical Center · USThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Updated from their original publication in 2004, these cancer genetic counseling recommendations describe the medical, psychosocial, and ethical ramifications of counseling at-risk individuals through genetic cancer risk assessment with or without genetic testing. They were developed by members of the Practice Issues Subcommittee of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Familial Cancer Risk Counseling Special Interest Group. The information contained in this document is derived from extensive review of the current literature on cancer genetic risk assessment and counseling as well as the personal expertise of genetic counselors specializing in cancer genetics. The recommendations are intended to provide information about the process of genetic counseling and risk assessment for hereditary cancer disorders rather than specific information about individual syndromes. Essential components include the intake, cancer risk assessment, genetic testing for an inherited cancer syndrome, informed consent, disclosure of genetic test results, and psychosocial assessment. These recommendations should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of management, nor does use of such recommendations guarantee a particular outcome. These recommendations do not displace a health care provider's professional judgment based on the clinical circumstances of a client.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGenetic TestingRisk AssessmentGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansNeoplasmsWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID22134580
OpenAlexW1988656726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.