Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22134474›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2012

Examining the effects of former cannabis use on cerebellum-dependent eyeblink conditioning in humans.

Adam B Steinmetz, Chad R Edwards, Jennifer M Vollmer, Molly A Erickson, Brian F O'Donnell, William P Hetrick, Patrick D Skosnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. New vistas on cannabis use disorder.Neuropharmacology · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Cannabinoids and Tremor Induced by Motor-related Disorders: Friend or Foe?Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2015
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adam B SteinmetzDepartment of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Chad R Edwards
Jennifer M Vollmer
Molly A Erickson
Brian F O'Donnell
William P Hetrick
Patrick D Skosnik

Funding

Neural Oscillations in Schizophrenia and a Rat ModelR21MH091774 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI O'DONNELL, BRIAN FRANCIS · 2010 to 2011
$421k
The Effect of Cannabis Use on Human Cerebellar FunctionR21DA023097 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI NEWMAN, SHARLENE D · 2007 to 2008
$384k
NIDA NIH HHS 1 R21 DA023097-01A1NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA023097NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH091774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePrevious work in humans has shown that chronic cannabis users exhibit disruptions in classical eyeblink conditioning (EBC), a form of associative learning that is known to be dependent on the cerebellum. Based upon previous work in animals, it was hypothesized that these learning deficits were related to cannabinoid receptor (CB1R) downregulation. However, it remains unclear whether there is a recovery of cerebellum-dependent learning after the cessation of cannabis use.

methodsTherefore, former cannabis users (n=10), current cannabis users (n=10), and cannabis-naïve controls (n=10), all free of DSM-IV Axis-I or -II disorders, were evaluated. A standard delay EBC procedure was utilized in which paired presentations of a conditioned stimulus (CS; e.g., tone) and a co-terminating unconditioned stimulus (US; e.g., ocular airpuff) were administered, thus eliciting a conditioned eyeblink response (CR). The primary dependent measures were percentage of CRs and CR latency across conditioning blocks.

resultsSimilar to prior studies, current cannabis users exhibited marked impairments in both the acquisition and timing of CRs compared to controls. Although former cannabis users showed intact CR acquisition compared to controls, they exhibited significantly impaired (shorter) CR latencies. In both cannabis groups, UR amplitude did not differ from controls, indicating normal US processing.

conclusionsThese data suggest that a recovery of function has occurred for the learning of the CS-US association, while the accurate timing of the CR shows lasting impairments. Taken together, these results suggest that heavy cannabis use can disrupt timing-related synaptic plasticity within the cerebellum, even after the cessation of cannabis use.

Indexed as

AdultBlinkingCase-Control StudiesCerebellumConditioning, ClassicalFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID22134474
PMCPMC3517929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.