Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22132133›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2011

Sensitivity of genome-wide-association signals to phenotyping strategy: the PROP-TAS2R38 taste association as a benchmark.

Ulrich K Genick, Zoltán Kutalik, Mirko Ledda, Maria C Souza Destito, Milena M Souza, Cintia A Cirillo, Nicolas Godinot, Nathalie Martin, Edgard Morya, Koichi Sameshima and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ulrich K GenickDepartment of Food-Consumer Interaction, Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland. ulrich.genick@rdls.nestle.com
Zoltán Kutalik
Mirko Ledda
Maria C Souza Destito
Milena M Souza
Cintia A Cirillo
Nicolas Godinot
Nathalie Martin
Edgard Morya
Koichi Sameshima
Sven Bergmann
Johannes le Coutre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural genetic variation can have a pronounced influence on human taste perception, which in turn may influence food preference and dietary choice. Genome-wide association studies represent a powerful tool to understand this influence. To help optimize the design of future genome-wide-association studies on human taste perception we have used the well-known TAS2R38-PROP association as a tool to determine the relative power and efficiency of different phenotyping and data-analysis strategies. The results show that the choice of both data collection and data processing schemes can have a very substantial impact on the power to detect genotypic variation that affects chemosensory perception. Based on these results we provide practical guidelines for the design of future GWAS studies on chemosensory phenotypes. Moreover, in addition to the TAS2R38 gene past studies have implicated a number of other genetic loci to affect taste sensitivity to PROP and the related bitter compound PTC. None of these other locations showed genome-wide significant associations in our study. To facilitate further, target-gene driven, studies on PROP taste perception we provide the genome-wide list of p-values for all SNPs genotyped in the current study.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAdolescentAdultAge DistributionBenchmarkingBody Mass IndexFemaleGenotypeHumansLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePropylthiouracilReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledTaste Receptors, Type 2

Identifiers

PMID22132133
PMCPMC3223210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.