Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22132127›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Chromosome isolation by flow sorting in Aegilops umbellulata and Ae. comosa and their allotetraploid hybrids Ae. biuncialis and Ae. geniculata.

István Molnár, Marie Kubaláková, Hana Šimková, András Cseh, Márta Molnár-Láng, Jaroslav Doležel

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Perspectives on the utilization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Intraspecific divergence of diploid grassComparative cytogenetics · 2023
    Article
  5. Comparative genomic analysis of 5MFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  6. Flow Cytometric Analysis and Sorting of Plant Chromosomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Flow karyotyping of wheat-Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chromosome analysis and sorting.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2021
    Review
  12. Production and characterization of a disomic 1M/1DMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Analysis of Structural Genomic Diversity inFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The karyotype ofMolecular cytogenetics · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

István MolnárAgricultural Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Martonvásár, Hungary.
Marie Kubaláková
Hana Šimková
András Cseh
Márta Molnár-Láng
Jaroslav Doležel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the potential of flow cytometry for chromosome sorting in two wild diploid wheats Aegilops umbellulata and Ae. comosa and their natural allotetraploid hybrids Ae. biuncialis and Ae. geniculata. Flow karyotypes obtained after the analysis of DAPI-stained chromosomes were characterized and content of chromosome peaks was determined. Peaks of chromosome 1U could be discriminated in flow karyotypes of Ae. umbellulata and Ae. biuncialis and the chromosome could be sorted with purities exceeding 95%. The remaining chromosomes formed composite peaks and could be sorted in groups of two to four. Twenty four wheat SSR markers were tested for their position on chromosomes of Ae. umbellulata and Ae. comosa using PCR on DNA amplified from flow-sorted chromosomes and genomic DNA of wheat-Ae. geniculata addition lines, respectively. Six SSR markers were located on particular Aegilops chromosomes using sorted chromosomes, thus confirming the usefulness of this approach for physical mapping. The SSR markers are suitable for marker assisted selection of wheat-Aegilops introgression lines. The results obtained in this work provide new opportunities for dissecting genomes of wild relatives of wheat with the aim to assist in alien gene transfer and discovery of novel genes for wheat improvement.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticTetraploidyChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantFlow CytometryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypeMetaphaseMicrosatellite RepeatsPhysical Chromosome MappingTriticumDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID22132127
PMCPMC3223179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.