Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22131394›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2012

A single-base substitution in the seed region of miR-184 causes EDICT syndrome.

Benjamin W Iliff, S Amer Riazuddin, John D Gottsch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin W IliffCenter for Corneal Genetics, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
S Amer Riazuddin
John D Gottsch
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Genetics of Fuchs Corneal DystrophyR01EY016835 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GOTTSCH, JOHN D · 2007 to 2017
$5.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016835NEI NIH HHS R01EY016835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the cause of the syndrome characterized by endothelial dystrophy, iris hypoplasia, congenital cataract, and stromal thinning (EDICT).

methodsPreviously a multigenerational family was reported that comprised 10 individuals affected by syndromal anterior segment dysgenesis. Blood samples were re-collected from eight affected and two unaffected individuals, and genomic DNA was extracted. A total of 24 candidate genes and 4 microRNAs residing within the critical interval were sequenced bidirectionally. In silico analyses were performed to examine the effect of the causal variant on the stability of the pre-microRNA structure.

resultsBidirectional sequencing identified the single-base substitution +57C>T in miR-184. This variation segregated with the disease phenotype and was absent in the 1000 Genomes project, 1130 control chromosomes, and 28 nonhuman vertebrates.

conclusionsThe single-base-pair substitution in the seed region of miR-184 is responsible for the disease phenotype observed in EDICT syndrome.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideCataractCorneal Dystrophies, HereditaryCorneal StromaEndothelium, CornealEye AbnormalitiesFemaleGene Expression RegulationGene LibraryHumansIrisMaleMicroRNAsPedigreePhenotypePolymerase Chain ReactionMicroRNAsMIRN184 microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID22131394
PMCPMC3292370
OpenAlexW2022133540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.