ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
Beyond DNA origami: the unfolding prospects of nucleic acid nanotechnology.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation biomedical nanorobots: active design, intelligent control, and translational opportunities in regenerative and minimally invasive medicine.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Aptamers as target-specific recognition elements in drug delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2025Review
- Toehold-Mediated Shape Transition of Nucleic Acid Nanoparticles.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of DNA nanocage uptake in zebrafish embryos for targeted tissue bioimaging applications.Nanoscale advances · 2023Article
- Sizing up DNA nanostructure assembly with native mass spectrometry and ion mobility.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Molecular architectonics of DNA for functional nanoarchitectures.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2020Review
- Structural and Functional Stability of DNA Nanopores in Biological Media.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Article
- Freezing shortens the lifetime of DNA molecules under tension.Journal of biological physics · 2017Article
- Nanomanufacturing: A Perspective.ACS nano · 2016Article
- Article
- Single-molecule tools for enzymology, structural biology, systems biology and nanotechnology: an update.Archives of toxicology · 2014Review
- Super-resolution fingerprinting detects chemical reactions and idiosyncrasies of single DNA pegboards.Nano letters · 2013Article
- Systems approaches for synthetic biology: a pathway toward mammalian design.Frontiers in physiology · 2013Article
- Engineered, harnessed, and hijacked: synthetic uses for cytoskeletal systems.Trends in cell biology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nucleic acid nanotechnology exploits the programmable molecular recognition properties of natural and synthetic nucleic acids to assemble structures with nanometer-scale precision. In 2006, DNA origami transformed the field by providing a versatile platform for self-assembly of arbitrary shapes from one long DNA strand held in place by hundreds of short, site-specific (spatially addressable) DNA 'staples'. This revolutionary approach has led to the creation of a multitude of two-dimensional and three-dimensional scaffolds that form the basis for functional nanodevices. Not limited to nucleic acids, these nanodevices can incorporate other structural and functional materials, such as proteins and nanoparticles, making them broadly useful for current and future applications in emerging fields such as nanomedicine, nanoelectronics, and alternative energy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.