ArticleJournal of cardiovascular pharmacology2012
Eribis peptide 94 reduces infarct size in rat hearts via activation of centrally located μ opioid receptors.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intra-operative anesthetic induced myocardial protection during cardiothoracic surgery: a literature review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Review
- Effects of the Delta Opioid Receptor Agonist DADLE in a Novel Hypoxia-Reoxygenation Model on Human and Rat-Engineered Heart Tissue: A Pilot Study.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Impact of Morphine Treatment on Infarct Size and Reperfusion Injury in Acute Reperfused ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Prospects for Creation of Cardioprotective and Antiarrhythmic Drugs Based on Opioid Receptor Agonists.Medicinal research reviews · 2016Review
- Opioid receptors and cardioprotection - 'opioidergic conditioning' of the heart.British journal of pharmacology · 2015Review
- Role of Opioid Receptors Signaling in Remote Electrostimulation--Induced Protection against Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Rat Hearts.PloS one · 2015Article
- Opioid-induced cardioprotection.Current pharmaceutical design · 2014Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Eribis peptide 94 (EP 94) is a novel enkephalin derivative that binds with high potency to μ and δ opioid receptors with less affinity for the κ opioid receptor. This compound has recently been shown to produce an acute reduction in myocardial infarct size in the anesthetized pig and rat partially via an endothelial nitric oxide synthase and KATP channel-dependent mechanism. EP 94 also was found to produce a chronic reduction in infarct size 24 hours postdrug administration via the upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase in rats. Despite these findings, no data have emerged in which the opioid receptor subtype responsible for cardioprotection has been identified and the site of action, heart, other peripheral organs, or the central nervous system, has not been addressed. In the current study, EP 94, was administered in 2 divided doses (0.5 μg/kg, intravenously) at 5 and 10 minutes into the ischemic period, and the opioid antagonists were administered 10 minutes before the onset of the 30-minute ischemic period. The selective antagonists used were the μ receptor antagonist CTOP (D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2), the δ receptor antagonists naltrindole and BNTX (7-benzylidenenaltrexone), and the κ receptor antagonist nor-BNI (norbinaltorphimine). Surprisingly, only CTOP completely blocked the cardioprotective effect of EP 94, whereas naltrindole, BNTX, and nor-BNI had modest but nonsignificant effects. Because there is controversial evidence suggesting that μ receptors may be absent in the adult rat myocardium, it was hypothesized that the protective effect of EP 94 may be mediated by an action outside the heart, perhaps in the central nervous system. To test this hypothesis, rats were pretreated with the nonselective opioid antagonist, naloxone hydrochloride, which penetrates the blood-brain barrier or naloxone methiodide, the quaternary salt of naloxone hydrochloride, which does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier before EP 94 administration. In support of a central nervous system site of action for EP 94, naloxone hydrochloride completely blocked its cardioprotective effect, whereas naloxone methiodide had no effect. These results suggest that EP 94 reduces infarct size (expressed as a percent of the area at risk) in the rat primarily via activation of central μ opioid receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.