Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22129914›Full record

ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2011

Extracorporeal versus peritoneal ultrafiltration in diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure--a review.

Zofia Wańkowicz, Agnieszka Próchnicka, Anna Olszowska, Daniel Baczyński, Paweł Krzesiński, Mirosław Dziuk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02829450 (Home-based Ultrafiltration for Congestive Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02829450 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Home-based Ultrafiltration for Congestive Heart Failure: Impact on Survival, Hospitalizations Rate, Quality of Life, Peritoneal Membrane Characteristics and Residual Renal Function With Different Treatment Modes

TypeobservationalSponsorSoroka University Medical CenterRan2015 to 2020Enrolled40ConditionsChronic Kidney Disease, Congestive Heart FailureArmsperitoneal ultrafiltration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The role of technological progress vs. accidental discoveries and clinical experience.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zofia WańkowiczDepartment of Internal Diseases, Nephrology and Dialysis, Military Medicine Institute, Central Hospital, Ministry of National Defence, Warsaw, Poland. zwankowicz@wim.mil.pl
Agnieszka Próchnicka
Anna Olszowska
Daniel Baczyński
Paweł Krzesiński
Mirosław Dziuk
Central Clinical Hospital · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure in the form of type 2 cardiorenal syndrome is a problem of growing significance in everyday clinical practice because of high morbidity and mortality. There has been scant progress in the treatment of overhydration, the main cause of symptoms in this group of patients. The aim of our review is to present recent advances in the ultrafiltration therapy of congestive heart failure, with special attention to the new dedicated device for extracorporeal isolated ultrafiltration, as well as modifications of peritoneal dialysis in the form of peritoneal ultrafiltration with icodextrin solution and incremental peritoneal dialysis. Technical and clinical features, costs and potential risks of available devices for isolated ultrafiltration are presented. This method should be reserved for patients with true diuretic resistance as part of a more complex strategy aiming at the adequate control of fluid retention. Peritoneal ultrafiltration is presented as a viable alternative to extracorporeal ultrafiltration because of medical and psychosocial benefits of home-based therapy, lower costs and more effective daily ultrafiltration. In conclusion, large, properly randomized and controlled clinical trials with long-term follow-up will be essential in assessing the logistics and cost-effectiveness of both methods. Most importantly, however, they should be able to evaluate the impact of both methods on preservation of renal function and delaying the progression of heart failure by interrupting the vicious circle of cardiorenal syndrome. Our review is supplemented with the case report of the use of peritoneal ultrafiltration with a single 12-hour nighttime icodextrin exchange as a life-saving procedure in a patient with congestive heart failure resistant to pharmacological treatment.<br />

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDiureticsHealth Planning GuidelinesHeart FailureHumansPeritoneal DialysisUltrafiltrationDiuretics

Identifiers

PMID22129914
PMCPMC3628132
OpenAlexW1986701316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.