Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22129844›Full record

ReviewDrug and alcohol dependence2012

μ-Opioid receptors and regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins: from a symposium on new concepts in mu-opioid pharmacology.

John Traynor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mixed-mechanism analgesics for mixed pain.Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Opioid research in the time of the opioid crisis.British journal of pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A Novel Morphine Drinking Model of Opioid Dependence in Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cholestasis and behavioral disorders.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Role of RGS12 in the differential regulation of kappa opioid receptor-dependent signaling and behavior.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Molecular Pharmacology of δ-Opioid Receptors.Pharmacological reviews · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

John TraynorDepartment of Pharmacology and Substance Abuse Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5632, United States. jtraynor@umich.edu
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

OPIOID RECEPTOR MECHANISMSR01DA004087 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TRAYNOR, JOHN R. · 1987 to 2010
$2.5M
Behavior, Biology, and Chemistry: Translational Research in Substance Use DisordersR13DA029347 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CHARLES P FRANCE, DAVID Richard MAGUIRE · 2011 to 2026
$388k
NIDA NIH HHS DA 04087NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA004087NIDA NIH HHS R13 DA029347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mu-opioid receptors (MOR) are the therapeutic target for opiate analgesic drugs and also mediate many of the side-effects and addiction liability of these compounds. MOR is a seven-transmembrane domain receptor that couples to intracellular signaling molecules by activating heterotrimeric G proteins. However, the receptor and G protein do not function in isolation but their activities are moderated by several accessory and scaffolding proteins. One important group of accessory proteins is the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein family, a large family of more than thirty members which bind to the activated Gα subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein and serve to accelerate signal termination. This action negatively modulates receptor signaling and subsequent behavior. Several members of this family, in particular RGS4 and RGS9-2 have been demonstrated to influence MOR signaling and morphine-induced behaviors, including reward. Moreover, this interaction is not unidirectional since morphine has been demonstrated to modulate expression levels of RGS proteins, especially RGS4 and RGS9-2, in a tissue and time dependent manner. In this article, I will discuss our work on the regulation of MOR signaling by RGS protein activity in cultured cell systems in the context of other in vitro and behavioral studies. In addition I will consider implications of the bi-directional interaction between MOR receptor activation and RGS protein activity and whether RGS proteins might provide a suitable and novel target for medications to manage addictive behaviors.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidHumansProtein BindingReceptors, Opioid, muRGS ProteinsSignal TransductionAnalgesics, OpioidReceptors, Opioid, muRGS Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22129844
PMCPMC3288798
OpenAlexW2022237409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.