Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22129781›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2012

Optical highlighter molecules in neurobiology.

Sandeep Robert Datta, George H Patterson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Expanding the Genetic Code for Neuronal Studies.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sandeep Robert DattaDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Room 336 Warren Alpert Bldg., 220 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States. srdatta@hms.harvard.edu
George H Patterson

Funding

BiophotonicsZIAEB000071 · NIBIB · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING · PI PATTERSON, GEORGE · 2010 to 2022
$9.7M
Revealing fear: new methods to study neural circuits, behavior and diseaseDP2OD007109 · OD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DATTA, SANDEEP R · 2010 to 2010
$2.5M
Characterizing Odor Maps in the Olfactory Bulb and CortexR01DC011558 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DATTA, SANDEEP R · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Intramural NIH HHSNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011558NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC011558NIH HHS DP2 OD007109NIH HHS DP2OD007109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of advanced optical methods has played a key role in propelling progress in neurobiology. Genetically-encoded fluorescent molecules found in nature have enabled labeling of individual neurons to study their physiology and anatomy. Here we discuss the recent use of both native and synthetic optical highlighter proteins to address key problems in neurobiology, including questions relevant to synaptic function, neuroanatomy, and the organization of neural circuits.

Indexed as

Luminescent ProteinsAnimalsHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeurobiologyNeuronsOptics and PhotonicsLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22129781
PMCPMC3294064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.