Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22129513›Full record

ArticleAddiction biology2012

Chemosensory responsiveness to ethanol and its individual sensory components in alcohol-preferring, alcohol-nonpreferring and genetically heterogeneous rats.

Susan M Brasser, Bryant C Silbaugh, Myles J Ketchum, Jeffrey J Olney, Christian H Lemon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan M BrasserCenter for Behavioral Teratology, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, 6330 Alvarado Ct., San Diego, CA 92120, USA. sbrasser@sciences.sdsu.edu
Bryant C Silbaugh
Myles J Ketchum
Jeffrey J Olney
Christian H Lemon
San Diego State University · USSaint Louis University · US

Funding

Rodents with Genetic Differences in Alcohol PreferenceR24AA015512 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI BELL, RICHARD LOWELL · 2005 to 2014
$5.1M
Rodents with Genetic Differences in Alcohol PreferenceU24AA015512 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BELL, RICHARD LOWELL · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
Orosensory Contributions to Alcohol IngestionR01AA015741 · NIAAA · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BRASSER, SUSAN M · 2007 to 2010
$1.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA015512NIAAA NIH HHS AA015741NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015741NIAAA NIH HHS R24 AA015512NIAAA NIH HHS U24 AA015512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alcohol activates orosensory circuits that project to motivationally relevant limbic forebrain areas that control appetite, feeding and drinking. To date, limited data exists regarding the contribution of chemosensory-derived ethanol reinforcement to ethanol preference and consumption. Measures of taste reactivity to intra-orally infused ethanol have not found differences in initial orofacial responses to alcohol between alcohol-preferring (P) and alcohol-non-preferring (NP) genetically selected rat lines. Yet, in voluntary intake tests, P rats prefer highly concentrated ethanol upon initial exposure, suggesting an early sensory-mediated attraction. Here, we directly compared self-initiated chemosensory responding for alcohol and prototypic sweet, bitter and oral trigeminal stimuli among selectively bred P, NP and non-selected Wistar (WI) outbred lines to determine whether differential sensory responsiveness to ethanol and its putative sensory components are phenotypically associated with genetically influenced alcohol preference. Rats were tested for immediate short-term lick responses to alcohol (3-40%), sucrose (0.01-1 M), quinine (0.01-3 mM) and capsaicin (0.003-1 mM) in a brief-access assay designed to index orosensory-guided behavior. P rats exhibited elevated short-term lick responses to both alcohol and sucrose relative to NP and WI lines across a broad range of concentrations of each stimulus and in the absence of blood alcohol levels that would produce significant post-absorptive effects. There was no consistent relationship between genetically mediated alcohol preference and orosensory avoidance of quinine or capsaicin. These data indicate that enhanced initial chemosensory attraction to ethanol and sweet stimuli are phenotypes associated with genetic alcohol preference and are considered within the framework of downstream activation of oral appetitive reward circuits.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAnimalsAppetiteCapsaicinConditioning, OperantEthanolGenetic HeterogeneityMaleMotivationQuinineRatsReinforcement, PsychologyRewardSelf AdministrationSensory System AgentsSucroseCapsaicinEthanolQuinineSensory System AgentsSucroseSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID22129513
PMCPMC3288312
OpenAlexW1766450525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.