Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22129377›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of food science and technology2011

Nutrigenomics and personalized diets: What will they mean for food?

J Bruce German, Angela M Zivkovic, David C Dallas, Jennifer T Smilowitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of food science and technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Application ofCurrent developments in nutrition · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Nutrigenomic Information in the openEHR Data Set.Applied clinical informatics · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J Bruce GermanFoods for Health Institute, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Angela M Zivkovic
David C Dallas
Jennifer T Smilowitz

Funding

Workshop on Environmental Technology Transfer and EntrepreneurshipP42ES004699 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HAMMOCK, BRUCE D · 1987 to 2021
$50.1M
UC Davis Center for Children's Environmental Health (CCEH)P01ES011269 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI VAN DE WATER, JUDY A. · 2001 to 2018
$12.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES011269NIEHS NIH HHS P01ES11269NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004699NIEHS NIH HHS P42ES004699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modern food system feeds six billion people with remarkable diversity, safety, and nutrition. Yet, the current rise in diet-related diseases is compromising health and devaluing many aspects of modern agriculture. Steps to increase the nutritional quality of individual foods will assist in personalizing health and in guiding individuals to achieve superior health. Nutrigenomics is the scientific field of the genetic basis for varying susceptibilities to disease and the diverse responses to foods. Although some of these genetic determinants will be simple and amenable to personal genotyping as the means to predict health, in practice most will not. As a result, genotyping will not be the secret to personalizing diet and health. Human assessment technologies from imaging to proteomics and metabolomics are providing tools to both understand and accurately assess the nutritional phenotype of individuals. The business models are also emerging to bring these assessment capabilities to industrial practice, in which consumers will know more about their personal health and seek personal solutions.

Indexed as

DietFood IndustryFood SupplyHealth PromotionPrecision MedicineAnimalsFood PreferencesHumansMetabolomicsNutrigenomicsNutritional StatusProteomics

Identifiers

PMID22129377
PMCPMC4414021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.