Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22128789›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2012

A randomised comparative trial on the use of a hydrogel with tepescohuite extract (Mimosa tenuiflora cortex extract-2G) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

Lorena Lammoglia-Ordiales, Maria Elisa Vega-Memije, Armando Herrera-Arellano, Erika Rivera-Arce, Juan Agüero, Felipe Vargas-Martinez, José Contreras-Ruiz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dressings and topical agents for treating venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Selection of Appropriate Wound Dressing for Various Wounds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorena Lammoglia-OrdialesDivision of Dermatology, Dr. Manuel Gea González General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico.
Maria Elisa Vega-Memije
Armando Herrera-Arellano
Erika Rivera-Arce
Juan Agüero
Felipe Vargas-Martinez
José Contreras-Ruiz
Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tepescohuite is an extract obtained from the bark of the Mimosa tenuiflora tree and is used as an empirical treatment in wounds for its healing and antiseptic properties. Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are a common health care problem in most countries with a high rate of morbidity. The standard of care is moist interactive healing and compression; however, the ideal topical treatment is yet to be established. This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of M. tenuiflora cortex extract (MTC-2G) in the treatment of VLUs in an Interdisciplinary Wound and Ostomy Care Center (IWOCC). A randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial was conducted to compare the use of a hydrogel containing MTC-2G with the hydrogel alone in VLUs. The study included all patients with venous ulcers referred to the IWOCC. Laboratory tests and tissue biopsies were performed at the beginning and at the end of the study. The patients were instructed to daily cleansing followed by topical application of the hydrogel and compression. Forty-one patients were included, 22 patients received the MTC-2G and 19 patients received the hydrogel only. Of the 41 patients, 32 completed the study, 18 in the experimental arm and 14 in the control group, 19 were women and 13 men. The mean age of the subjects was 60 years. The mean time from presentation was 38 months. The mean surface reduction was 6·29 cm(2) [confidence interval (IC) 95%: 3·28-9·29] (P = 0·0001) in the MTC-2G group and 5·85 cm(2) (95% CI: 3·58-8·12) (P = 0·001) in the hydrogel group. There was no significant difference between the groups (P = 0·815). No changes in the laboratory parameters were noted. In the histology, there were not any differences between groups either. A hydrogel containing MTC-2G was not superior to a hydrogel alone in the treatment of VLUs.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAgedBiopsy, NeedleDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateImmunohistochemistryLeg UlcerMaleMiddle AgedPlant ExtractsProspective StudiesHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylatePlant Extractstepescohuite

Identifiers

PMID22128789
PMCPMC7950610
OpenAlexW2027946140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.