Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2212847›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease1990

Peroperative contamination and anastomotic leakage after resection for left colon stenosis. An experimental study in the rat.

A Törnqvist, H Jiborn, B Zederfeldt, A Forsgren

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A TörnqvistDepartment of Surgery, University of Lund, Malmö General Hospital, Sweden.
H Jiborn
B Zederfeldt
A Forsgren
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this experimental study the effect of peroperative faecal soiling on immediate postoperative anastomotic leakage after resection and primary anastomosis of a left colon obstruction was evaluated. Faecal soiling was quantified by a standardized irrigation of the abdominal cavity and then culturing of the fluid. An increased peroperative soiling was found after resection of a stenosis compared to resection of a non-stenotic bowel. Anastomotic complications were correlated to the degree of bacterial contamination and a breakpoint of 10(4) CFU/ml was found. Immediate postoperative leakage, tested with the bacteria Serratia marcescens, was not increased in the stenosis group. Thus, peroperative bacterial contamination seems to be one important factor in developing anastomotic complications after resection of colonic obstruction while an immediate leakage of bacteria through the anastomosis seems to be less important.

Indexed as

FecesAnastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsColonic DiseasesEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsIntestinal ObstructionIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleRatsRats, Inbred StrainsSerratia marcescensSurgical Wound DehiscenceTherapeutic IrrigationTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID2212847
OpenAlexW2328867814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.