ReviewPediatric radiology2011
Imaging of congenital coronary artery anomalies.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-risk anatomical features: a new perspective on refined echocardiographic diagnosis of anomalous coronary artery origin from the opposite sinus.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Management of anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries in children: A single-center experience.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2026Article
- Article
- Addition of gadolinium contrast to three-dimensional SSFP MR sequences improves the visibility of coronary artery anatomy in young children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Non-contrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography: current frontiers and future horizons.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Review
- Percutaneous Intervention of a Single Coronary Artery in the Setting of Acute Coronary Syndrome.Cardiology research · 2017Article
- Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery in children: diagnostic use of multidetector computed tomography.Pediatric radiology · 2016Article
- Third-generation dual-source 70-kVp chest CT angiography with advanced iterative reconstruction in young children: image quality and radiation dose reduction.Pediatric radiology · 2016Article
- Assessments of Coronary Artery Visibility and Radiation Dose in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease on Cardiac 128-slice CT and on Cardiac 64-slice CT.Pediatric cardiology · 2016Article
- Article
- Percutaneous intervention in a patient with a rare single coronary artery from the left coronary sinus of valsava.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2014Article
- Soccer and Sudden Cardiac Death in Young Competitive Athletes: A Review.Journal of sports medicine (Hindawi Publishing Corporation) · 2013Review
- Application of prospective ECG-triggered dual-source CT coronary angiography for infants and children with coronary artery aneurysms due to Kawasaki disease.The British journal of radiology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imaging of the coronary arteries is an important part of the evaluation of children with congenital heart disease and isolated congenital coronary artery anomalies. Echocardiography remains the main imaging modality and is complemented by MRI and CT angiography in the older or difficult-to-image child. We review echocardiography, MRI, and CT angiography for coronary artery imaging, with emphasis on techniques. The clinical implications of isolated congenital coronary artery anomalies are also addressed, along with a discussion about the current consensus on optimal management of these anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.