Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22127592›Full record

ReviewHistology and histopathology2012

Advances in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma characterization and disease model development.

D O'Brien, A G Jacob, S J Qualman, D S Chandler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Histology and histopathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Germline predisposition to genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma.Translational andrology and urology · 2020
    Review
  5. miRNA signatures in childhood sarcomas and their clinical implications.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cancer cell international · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D O'BrienThe Center for Childhood Cancer, Columbus Children's Research Institute and the Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
A G Jacob
S J Qualman
D S Chandler

Funding

Coordinately regulated alternative splicing in DNA damage and cancerR01CA133571 · NCI · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI CHANDLER, DAWN S · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA133571NCI NIH HHS R01 CA133571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), a form of soft tissue sarcoma, is one of the most common pediatric malignancies. A complex disease with at least three different subtypes, it is characterized by perturbations in a number of signaling pathways and genetic abnormalities. Extensive clinical studies have helped classify these tumors into high and low risk groups to facilitate different treatment regimens. Research into the etiology of the disease has helped uncover numerous potential therapeutic intervention points which can be tested on various animal models of RMS; both genetically modified models and tumor xenograft models. Taken together, there has been a marked increase in the survival rate of RMS patients but the highly invasive, metastatic forms of the disease continue to baffle researchers. This review aims to highlight and summarize some of the most important developments in characterization and in vivo model generation for RMS research, in the last few decades.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAge FactorsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMicePrognosisRhabdomyosarcomaRisk FactorsXenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Identifiers

PMID22127592
PMCPMC3922709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.