Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22127579›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2013

Finding consistent patterns: a nonparametric approach for identifying differential expression in RNA-Seq data.

Jun Li, Robert Tibshirani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 214 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
214citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

214 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. SIEVEseq: unified differential expression, variability, and skewness analyses using RNA-Seq data.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Transcriptional dynamics during karyogamy in rice zygotes.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Detecting differential transcript usage in complex diseases with SPIT.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article

154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jun Li1Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Robert Tibshirani

Funding

Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Melinda L. Telli · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
NHLBI PROTEOMICS INITIATIVE-N01HV28183N01HV028183 · HV · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 2002 to 2006
–
PLATELET INTERACTIONS WITH FIBRINOGEN AND CALCIUMR01HL028183 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI PEERSCHKE, ELLINOR I · 1985 to 1992
–
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV028183NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-28183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We discuss the identification of features that are associated with an outcome in RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) and other sequencing-based comparative genomic experiments. RNA-Seq data takes the form of counts, so models based on the normal distribution are generally unsuitable. The problem is especially challenging because different sequencing experiments may generate quite different total numbers of reads, or 'sequencing depths'. Existing methods for this problem are based on Poisson or negative binomial models: they are useful but can be heavily influenced by 'outliers' in the data. We introduce a simple, non-parametric method with resampling to account for the different sequencing depths. The new method is more robust than parametric methods. It can be applied to data with quantitative, survival, two-class or multiple-class outcomes. We compare our proposed method to Poisson and negative binomial-based methods in simulated and real data sets, and find that our method discovers more consistent patterns than competing methods.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, RNAStatistics, NonparametricHumansdifferential expressionFDRnonparametricresamplingRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID22127579
PMCPMC4605138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.