Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22127387›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2012

Insecticidal evaluation of essential oils of Citrus sinensis L. (Myrtales: Myrtaceae) against housefly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae).

Peeyush Kumar, Sapna Mishra, Anushree Malik, Santosh Satya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. Contact and Fumigant Activities ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. In Vitro Evaluation of Acute Toxicity of FivePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Toxicities of monoterpenes against housefly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Article
  11. Microscopic investigation to determine the effect ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2017
    Article
  12. Bioefficacy of Some Egyptian Aromatic Plants onJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Chemistry and Pharmacology of Citrus sinensis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  15. Insecticidal activity of Jatropha curcas extracts against housefly, Musca domestica.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peeyush KumarApplied Microbiology Laboratory, Centre for Rural Development & Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, 110 016, India.
Sapna Mishra
Anushree Malik
Santosh Satya
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The housefly, Musca domestica L., is one of the most common insects, associated with vectoring of various etiological agents. In order to search for effective control agent, the essential oil of sweet orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] was evaluated for its insecticidal activity against the larvae and pupae of housefly using contact toxicity and fumigation bioassays. In the contact toxicity assay, lethal concentration, LC(50) of C. sinensis essential oil against housefly larvae, varied between 3.93 and 0.71 μl/cm(2) for different observation days, while lethal time, LT(50), varied between 5.8 to 2.3 days. Mortality of larvae were significant with different concentrations (F = 2.79, df = 4, P < 0.05) and time (F = 6.69, df = 3, P < 0.01). In fumigant assay for housefly larvae, LC(50) of 71.2 and 52.6 μl/l was obtained in 24 and 48 h, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy of oil treated larvae revealed extreme dehydration and surface distortion while control larvae were free from any of the above symptoms and presented smooth surface, conforming effect of essential oil on housefly larvae. Percentage inhibition rate of oil against housefly pupae was 27.3-72.7% for contact toxicity and 46.4-100% for fumigation assay. Compositional analysis of C. sinensis essential oil using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) revealed D: -limonene (73.24%), α-pinene (5.86%) and myrcene (4.45%) as major components whereas its vapour profile (solid-phase micro extraction-GC/MS) was dominated by D: -limonene at 92.57%. Significant activity of C. sinensis essential oil against larvae and pupae of housefly, pave the way for its use as eco-friendly housefly control measure.

Indexed as

AnimalsCitrus sinensisGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHousefliesInsecticidesLarvaMicroscopy, ElectronOils, VolatilePupaSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsInsecticidesOils, Volatile

Identifiers

PMID22127387
OpenAlexW1968581277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.