ArticleKidney international2011
What patients don't know may hurt them: knowledge and the perception of knowledge among patients with CKD.
Article in Kidney international, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Urban residents' health literacy of four major cancers: a cross-sectional national survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Missing In-Center Hemodialysis Sessions among Patients with End Stage Renal Disease in Banda Aceh, Indonesia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Perceived and Objective Kidney Disease Knowledge in Patients With Advanced CKD Followed in a Multidisciplinary CKD Clinic.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2020Article
- Patients,' Nephrologists,' and Predicted Estimations of ESKD Risk Compared with 2-Year Incidence of ESKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2019Observational
- Primary care physicians' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to management of chronic kidney disease: A mixed methods study.PloS one · 2019Article
- Risk prediction to inform surveillance of chronic kidney disease in the US Healthcare Safety Net: a cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2016Article
- Perspectives on optimizing care of patients in multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease clinics.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2016Review
- Factors influencing choice of renal replacement therapy in European paediatric nephrology units.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2013Article
- Association between family members of dialysis patients and chronic kidney disease: a multicenter study in China.BMC nephrology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is generally accepted that informed patients have better health outcomes. Wright Nunes et al. report low levels of perceived chronic kidney disease (CKD) knowledge among patients treated in a nephrology clinic and describe a low-to-moderate association between perceived and objective CKD knowledge. Association of these two types of knowledge with health behaviors and clinical outcomes should be further explored to inform the development and evaluation of CKD educational interventions as well as communication between nephrologists and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22126982What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.