Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22126621›Full record

ArticleCancer science2012

Predicting cetuximab accumulation in KRAS wild-type and KRAS mutant colorectal cancer using 64Cu-labeled cetuximab positron emission tomography.

Arifudin Achmad, Hirofumi Hanaoka, Hiroki Yoshioka, Shinji Yamamoto, Hideyuki Tominaga, Takuya Araki, Yasuhiro Ohshima, Noboru Oriuchi, Keigo Endo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Toward OptimizedPharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. PET imaging of EGFR expression using anEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A purification system forJournal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arifudin AchmadDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan. arifudinachmad@gmail.com
Hirofumi Hanaoka
Hiroki Yoshioka
Shinji Yamamoto
Hideyuki Tominaga
Takuya Araki
Yasuhiro Ohshima
Noboru Oriuchi
Keigo Endo
Gunma University · JPJapan Atomic Energy Agency · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is common in colorectal cancer. However, cetuximab as an EGFR-targeting drug is useful only for a subset of patients and currently no single predictor other than V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation status has been established. In the present study, we investigated cetuximab accumulation in colorectal tumors and major organs using (111)In-DOTA-cetuximab. We also evaluated the potential of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab. Colorectal tumor xenografts with a different EGFR expression level and KRAS mutation status were subjected to in vivo biodistribution study and PET imaging at 48 h post-injection of radiolabeled cetuximab. The EGFR expression levels on colorectal tumors were determined by ex vivo immunoblotting and ELISA. We found that KRAS wild-type tumors had significantly higher (111)In-DOTA-cetuximab accumulation than KRAS mutant tumors (P < 0.001). Based on KRAS mutation status, a strong correlation was found between (111)In-DOTA-cetuximab tumor uptake and EGFR expression level (KRAS wild type: r = 0.988; KRAS mutant: r = 0.829), and between (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab tumor uptake with EGFR expression level (KRAS wild type: r = 0.838; KRAS mutant: r = 0.927). Significant correlation was also found between tumor uptake of (111)In-DOTA-cetuximab and (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab (r = 0.920). PET imaging with (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab allowed clear visualization of tumors. Both radiolabeled cetuximab had effectively visualized cetuximab accumulation in colorectal tumors with a wide variety of EGFR expression levels and different KRAS mutation status as commonly encountered in the clinical setting. Our findings suggest that this radioimmunoimaging therefore can be clinically translated as an in vivo tool to predict cetuximab accumulation in colorectal cancer patients prior to cetuximab therapy.

Indexed as

MutationRadiopharmaceuticalsAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsCopper RadioisotopesErbB ReceptorsFemaleHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHT29 CellsHumansIndium RadioisotopesMice1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane- 1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acidAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabCopper RadioisotopesErbB ReceptorsHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingIndium RadioisotopesKras protein, ratProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID22126621
PMCPMC7713619
OpenAlexW2169590829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.