ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2011
Predicting Alzheimer's risk: why and how?
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Ensemble Techniques for Early Prediction of Alzhiemer Disease.Research square · 2024Article
- Applications of Bayesian shrinkage prior models in clinical research with categorical responses.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Risk Models Based on Non-Cognitive Measures May Identify Presymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Article
- Late-life depression, subjective cognitive decline, and their additive risk in incidence of dementia: A nationwide longitudinal study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Increased risk of death associated with the use of proton-pump inhibitors in patients with dementia and controls - a pharmacoepidemiological claims data analysis.European journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Predicting sporadic Alzheimer's disease progression via inherited Alzheimer's disease-informed machine-learning.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2020Article
- Machine-learning based identification of undiagnosed dementia in primary care: a feasibility study.BJGP open · 2018Article
- Frailty is an independent predictor of incident dementia: Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Age-related deficit accumulation and the risk of late-life dementia.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Because the pathologic processes that underlie Alzheimer's disease (AD) appear to start 10 to 20 years before symptoms develop, there is currently intense interest in developing techniques to accurately predict which individuals are most likely to become symptomatic. Several AD risk prediction strategies - including identification of biomarkers and neuroimaging techniques and development of risk indices that combine traditional and non-traditional risk factors - are being explored. Most AD risk prediction strategies developed to date have had moderate prognostic accuracy but are limited by two key issues. First, they do not explicitly model mortality along with AD risk and, therefore, do not differentiate individuals who are likely to develop symptomatic AD prior to death from those who are likely to die of other causes. This is critically important so that any preventive treatments can be targeted to maximize the potential benefit and minimize the potential harm. Second, AD risk prediction strategies developed to date have not explored the full range of predictive variables (biomarkers, imaging, and traditional and non-traditional risk factors) over the full preclinical period (10 to 20 years). Sophisticated modeling techniques such as hidden Markov models may enable the development of a more comprehensive AD risk prediction algorithm by combining data from multiple cohorts. As the field moves forward, it will be critically important to develop techniques that simultaneously model the risk of mortality as well as the risk of AD over the full preclinical spectrum and to consider the potential harm as well as the benefit of identifying and treating high-risk older patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.